Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 31 May 2005 (Tuesday) 01:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

is the field of view always smaller on shorter lenses? (ex 28mm vs 35mm)?

 
brentw505
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined May 2005
     
May 31, 2005 01:35 |  #1

i have a tamron 28-200mm macro lens with a 10d right now... was wondering if the tamron lens, on 28mm, would have a wider view than the 35mm 1.4L wide angle lens. does longer always mean shorter view of anlgle? or is that just usually what it is?

another question: what is a 35mm camera? is that always a film camera? what is the 35mm refering to?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persian-Rice
Goldmember
1,531 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
     
May 31, 2005 01:46 |  #2

narrower field of view, not shorter heh.

You are comparing a 28mm to a 35mm? I'm confused, what are you trying to ask?

The shorter the focal length the wider the field of view, 17mm is not going to be"wider" then another 17mm, unless you have some extra stuff going on like cropping. 28mm will be wider then any 35mm. Where did you get the idea it would otherwise? just wondering.

Are you talking about physical dimensions? because that will have nothing to do with it, just the design of the lens. The Tamron 28-75 is much smaller then the Canon 28-70. But they pretty much show the same thing.

I hope I covered it somewhere in there.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persian-Rice
Goldmember
1,531 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
     
May 31, 2005 01:53 |  #3

35mm is the dimension of the film........Most sensors on dSLRs are smaller, other then 1Ds series. That's why you get crop factor. Don't be confused by 35mm, 4x5, 6x4.5, or 6x7.

Those refer to the size of the film or in digital's case the sensor. Don't mix them up with lens focal length.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brentw505
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined May 2005
     
May 31, 2005 01:53 |  #4

i never really knew what those numbers really meant... i just thought that it was the length of the lens... didnt know if every 25mm lens has the same field of view as any other 25mm lens




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persian-Rice
Goldmember
1,531 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
     
May 31, 2005 01:54 |  #5

http://www.millhouse.n​l/digitalcropfactor.ht​ml (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Persian-Rice
Goldmember
1,531 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Behind a viewfinder.
     
May 31, 2005 01:57 |  #6

Yes, the designs are what makes the actual physical dimensions of the lens. In terms of advertised focal length, they will be as advertised. Referring the link above, all D series digital SLRs are 1.6 crop factor because the dimensions of the sensor are pretty small.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rent
Senior Member
651 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
     
May 31, 2005 02:07 as a reply to  @ brentw505's post |  #7

the mm number is the "focal length" of a lens. shorter focal length = wider field of view for any given camera format. camera format is determined by the size of the imager (film, or digital sensor).

so yeah, for the 35mm format (35mm film, or the 1Ds series), all lens with the same focal length has the same FOV.

with a smaller imager format like the sensor on the 10D/20D/DRebel, a lens would give a smaller FOV on such cameras as it would on a larger format. this is known as the crop factor (which tends to lead to very long threads, especially when mixed with other technical terms, LOL).

good luck and welcome to the forum!

-alex

brentw505 wrote:
i never really knew what those numbers really meant... i just thought that it was the length of the lens... didnt know if every 25mm lens has the same field of view as any other 25mm lens


http://portfolio.alexj​iang.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,359 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
is the field of view always smaller on shorter lenses? (ex 28mm vs 35mm)?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1880 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.