Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 14 Oct 2009 (Wednesday) 17:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

High School football! Needing some real critique... Please? :)

 
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Oct 15, 2009 10:34 |  #16

FPS is way over rated. I shoot at 1 frame per second during night football and do fine.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottdog129
Senior Member
Avatar
637 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Reno, Nevada USA
     
Oct 15, 2009 17:04 |  #17

TaylorT wrote in post #8824207 (external link)
Thank you soooo much for the feedback everyone! It's been super helpful.

TaylorT: Im just now starting to get into shooting sports for my son's football team as well. Amazing job at this! What settings were you using on your camera, if you dont mind me asking?


Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com (external link)
Canon EOS 30D - Canon 18-55mm f/3.5 - Sigma 10-20mm f/4 DSM -Canon 55-250mm IS - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Oct 15, 2009 18:07 as a reply to  @ Scottdog129's post |  #18

Looking @ image #2 above this is what seperated the GWC and sport togs. In this play force yourself to track the tacklers not the ball carrier.

IMHO no one realy cares if the runner's back is in focus - in this play if you focus on the tackler than you have a keeper.

Good Rule - if you can't see their eyes - no one cares, don't waste your shutter count unless it's a really significant play.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,135 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Oct 15, 2009 20:15 |  #19

You don't need faces in football. Its nice if your trying to sell to mom and dads. But a good football picture does not need a face. I would recommend you go over to SI.COM, go to the picture area, and study the shots that catch your attention. Look for the elements that make it a great shot to you. Many good shots have a face in them, but many just do not. Emotion drives some shots, contact and pure athletic skill the others.

Another rule that need to be broken from time to time is shooting tight. Do it too much and all you have is cookie cutter shots. Often you get more information from a well done wide shot - a player exploiting a whole, or going over the line. Shot tight, you loose impact.

So while rules are a good guide, develop your own style by looking at shots that move you in one way or another. Studying others work will teach you a ton.

Cheers and keep clicking away....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaylorT
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
221 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: US
     
Oct 15, 2009 21:30 |  #20

Ooooops I TOTALLY forgot I had my extender on in most of these photos! But here's an example of one of my photo's data scottdog...
Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/1600)
Aperture: f/4.0
Focal Length: 280 mm
ISO Speed: 400

But yeah I wasn't shooting anything under 1/1000. If I could shoot at 1/2000 I would bump the ISO down to 200.

If I didn't have my extender on it would look more like...

Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/2000)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 190 mm
ISO Speed: 100


7D w/ Grip, 5D Mark III, 70-200 f/2.8II, 24-105 f/4, 85mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,206 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
High School football! Needing some real critique... Please? :)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2861 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.