Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 14 Oct 2009 (Wednesday) 19:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I am after some advice. Night shooting

 
Whippeticious
Goldmember
Avatar
2,302 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 14, 2009 19:12 |  #1

I am going to see my friends dog race tonight and I would love to get some good photos for them. I've previously been told it will be tungsten lighting so that part's easy, I can set for that or change it afterwards. I estimate I will be about 20-30 yards away from the dogs and I hope to get some good running shots, preferably with it passing the post first!
I have a 400D and 3 usable lenses. The 50 1.4, the 100 2.8 macro and the 70-200 2.8 IS. I am assuming I'd be best to use either the 50 or the 70-200 but if anyone has any advice I am listening.
I think I would need to have at least 1000th shutter speed and I dont know if I can get enough light. If I set it on 1/1000th I would imagine it will automatically go to the widest aperture. I dont much like my camera over 400 ISO but I realise I will probably have to go up to 1600. Is there anything else I can do.
I can probably practice on some races before theirs but I really dont want to stuff it up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 14, 2009 19:41 |  #2

The 50mm will be too short at that range. You will have to use the 70-200/2.8. I'd set the camera in M mode to ISO1600, f/2.8 and 1/1000 and see how awful the underexposure is. Given most outdoor lighting schemes this will be quite a bit underexposed.

From there you have compromises to make. You can stick to 1/1000 and push the exposure in post processing. You will need noiseware to live with the results.

Or start dropping the shutter speed and live with some blur. If you pan well you might get some really interesting shots where the head and body of the dog are sharp and only the legs are blurred. That might be artistically quite appealing.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Oct 14, 2009 19:45 |  #3

JeffreyG wrote in post #8823541 (external link)
The 50mm will be too short at that range. You will have to use the 70-200/2.8. I'd set the camera in M mode to ISO1600, f/2.8 and 1/1000 and see how awful the underexposure is. Given most outdoor lighting schemes this will be quite a bit underexposed.

From there you have compromises to make. You can stick to 1/1000 and push the exposure in post processing. You will need noiseware to live with the results.

Or start dropping the shutter speed and live with some blur. If you pan well you might get some really interesting shots where the head and body of the dog are sharp and only the legs are blurred. That might be artistically quite appealing.

in other words .... you have your work cut out for you. good luck :D!

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whippeticious
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,302 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 14, 2009 19:58 |  #4

Hmmmm thanks. I'll give it my best shot.
Now, I am not going out to buy new gear, but is there anything, camera and lens combo that could achieve good shots and what would they be. Just curious.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Oct 14, 2009 20:06 |  #5

Whippeticious wrote in post #8823631 (external link)
Hmmmm thanks. I'll give it my best shot.
Now, I am not going out to buy new gear, but is there anything, camera and lens combo that could achieve good shots and what would they be. Just curious.

in a situation like this a camera that's capable of a clean iso 3200 and a fast prime lens would be ideal.

i'm thinking 1d mark III + 135L f2 or 100 f2. but that's ideal, not practical.

no matter what you're using you'll sometimes be confronted with the limits of your equipment. i'd probably try panning with the 70-200 at a shutter speed like 1/125s or slower if you have to.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whippeticious
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,302 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 14, 2009 23:50 |  #6

Just thought of something else, I've never quite understood. Metering mode. Should it be evaluative, Partial or center weighted? This isn't really a lens question anymore sorry but when and how do I use each one of them to best effect.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lkiller123
Member
87 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Oct 14, 2009 23:59 |  #7

Isn't 1/1000 a bit too fast? Try to do ISO 800, it will be acceptable. If not, there's always noise reduction in PP;)


High school student on a budget...
No more camera.. :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whippeticious
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,302 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 15, 2009 00:02 |  #8

lkiller123 wrote in post #8825018 (external link)
Isn't 1/1000 a bit too fast? Try to do ISO 800, it will be acceptable. If not, there's always noise reduction in PP;)

They're racing greyhounds, I want to freeze the action, they go pretty fast. I hope I will be able to practice on a few races before their dogs race so I might try a few speeds.
not sure what PP is but I dont have photoshop, if that's what it is. I am not good with jargon I prefer actual words.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whippeticious
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,302 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Australia
     
Oct 15, 2009 02:01 |  #9

Oh well, I am off, I am taking the 70-200 and the 50, wish me luck, hope I get some good shots for them, and more importantly I hope he wins.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,244 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
I am after some advice. Night shooting
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
887 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.