Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 15 Oct 2009 (Thursday) 00:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st time night soccer with flash

 
int2str
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 15, 2009 00:08 |  #1

Today I got to try out my monopod with under-the-lens flash at a night soccer game. Since my 70-200mm is still at Canon I had to shoot with my 300mm f/4. I think that lens is a bit too long. It seems like the 580 EX II couldn't properly light the players when they were too far away. With the 70-200mm I can shoot much closer where the flash doesn't have to work that hard.

A few questions:
1) I still got a ton of red-eye even so the flash is mounted upside down 1 segment below the camera on the monopod. Any way to improve this?

2) It was hard for me to tell whether the flash was aimed right. How do you guys check flash aim?

3) ETTL didn't seem to work that great. I dialed in FEC +1 3/4 but it still seemed to little. I later switched the flash to manual power (1/4th) and that seemed to work better. Should I forget about ETTL?

4) When I still did use ETTL, I used center-weighted metering. Does this apply to the flash or is the metering mode only used for the camera itself (I shot in M mode, so it wouldn't matter for the camera)?

Any other tips regarding shutter speed selection, flash positioning or anything that might help?

Some pictures from today:

1. 1/200th, f/4, ISO 1600, ETTL

IMAGE: http://lh4.ggpht.com/_uFrS5yCiGps/StasCDlZfhI/AAAAAAAAMeM/Zl6x8FibIkA/s800/IMG_1384.JPG

2. 1/200th, f/4, ISO 1600, ETTL
IMAGE: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_uFrS5yCiGps/StasHZXeiKI/AAAAAAAAMeg/AX7kpa55OvA/s800/IMG_1402.JPG

3. 1/250th, f/4, ISO 1600, ETTL
IMAGE: http://lh3.ggpht.com/_uFrS5yCiGps/StasYQan8oI/AAAAAAAAMfU/UdcNr-aUpxE/s800/IMG_1424.JPG

4. 1/250th, f/4, ISO 1600, manual flash 1/4
IMAGE: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_uFrS5yCiGps/StasoagSiXI/AAAAAAAAMf0/_62ksN5garo/s800/IMG_1431.JPG

5. 1/250th, f/4, ISO 1600, manual flash 1/4
IMAGE: http://lh4.ggpht.com/_uFrS5yCiGps/Stasy4_C_oI/AAAAAAAAMgI/dBtPuEjHJSk/s800/IMG_1441.JPG



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JamieDubS
Member
Avatar
176 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Deezy
     
Oct 15, 2009 00:12 |  #2

the only thing that looks focused in the first two shots is the grass??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Oct 15, 2009 07:24 |  #3

About the focus. I think you experienced what I have using flash at night on a poorly lit field. The low-light focus capabililities of the camera and lens isn't nearly as good as it would be with better light.

Shot football a couple of weeks back with flash, (my only option) and then high-ISO on a well lit field. No comparison in focus capabilities on the well-lit field to the morbidly dark field where flash had to be used.

This is my biggest road block to using flash for football. If it's so dark on the field that flash has to be used, the camera and lens can't provide accurate focus anyway. So what you end up with is really bright, OOF shots!

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:53 |  #4

Danny had great luck with TTL so hopefully he chimes in here. Personally, I use M at 1/4-1/2 and then adjust my aperture to properly expose (stop down a touch when close, open as they move away). I'll typically leave ISO around 800. Point is, you want it pretty dark. The toughest fields are those in between where its harder to overcome the ambient. Focus does look like an issue on these but they alos seem a bit underexposed to me as well. Perhaps go to 1/2 M and make sure you are giving your camera time to lock on. It may mean missing a few peak shots here and there but if that peak shot is OOF, it doesn't matter much anyway.


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Oct 15, 2009 12:56 |  #5

lol... oh boy... this could get interesting.. but scott you are right.. good write up..


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:03 |  #6

Maybe I've been staring at these too long, but honestly I didn't think they were really OOF. Though I do have to say, I did a test shot of some unlit trashcans at the field and it didn't focus correctly at all even so the camera's focus confirmation light came on.

Will the 70-200mm f/2.8 make a difference in focusing ability?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:08 |  #7

I also wanted to add that this may not be a good start for the 7d... if it isnt focusing correctly in bad light...

int2str- It might be a smidge more accurate but who knows..


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:33 |  #8

canonnoob wrote in post #8828074 (external link)
I also wanted to add that this may not be a good start for the 7d... if it isnt focusing correctly in bad light...

Hey, don't judge a camera by this lousy operator! ;)
I've used it indoors in very low light a few times already and it focused great.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyofizz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,340 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
     
Oct 15, 2009 18:36 as a reply to  @ int2str's post |  #9

Slap a Better Beamer on that flash, you'll get better results.


Dave - Fuzzy Hashing makes me itch.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 15, 2009 18:41 |  #10

If I use the 70-200mm would I still need the better beamer?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clarence
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 15, 2009 19:51 |  #11

int2str wrote in post #8825048 (external link)
Today I got to try out my monopod with under-the-lens flash at a night soccer game.

I still got a ton of red-eye even so the flash is mounted upside down 1 segment below the camera on the monopod. Any way to improve this?

The rule of thumb that I've seen is that for every 1 inch you raise or lower the flash is good for 1 foot of red-eye prevention. So if your flash was 10" below your lens, then subjects 10' away from you should not be vulnerable to red-eye.

But if you're out of range for your flash, then the players were probably more than 10' away.

Also, did you max out the zoom angle on your flash to 105mm?

The BetterBeamer is supposed to be for over 200mm and the instructions say to set the flash zoom to 50mm... this fills up the fresnel/lenticular magnifier.


For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm

5D3, 1D4, 7D, 600/4L, 200/1.8L, Sigmonster 300-800mm, 80-200/2.8L MDP, 28-70/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.4, 12-24mm, (4) 550EXs, (4) WL strobes, PW MiniTT1/FlexTT5s/AC3/A​C9s
LoCo-Photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyofizz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,340 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
     
Oct 15, 2009 23:02 |  #12

int2str wrote in post #8830051 (external link)
If I use the 70-200mm would I still need the better beamer?

The BB will get you more distance for your power.


Dave - Fuzzy Hashing makes me itch.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,885 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
1st time night soccer with flash
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2727 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.