I prefer the lightroom images. I'd like to see 100% crops to judge this sort of thing.
What exactly does the "100% crop" term mean? The images I posted were right right off the camera with no additional cropping.
Oct 17, 2009 11:36 | #16 tim wrote in post #8837890 I prefer the lightroom images. I'd like to see 100% crops to judge this sort of thing. What exactly does the "100% crop" term mean? The images I posted were right right off the camera with no additional cropping. https://photography-on-the.net …?p=8681946&postcount=1961Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2009 11:47 | #17 mdaniel wrote in post #8839960 What exactly does the "100% crop" term mean? The images I posted were right right off the camera with no additional cropping. And to post the image on PotN you had to shrink it down to 800 pixels wide. That meant shrinking it down to 15% of the original linear dimensions. That means you can't see the original, individual pixels. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mckamey Hatchling 1 post Joined May 2009 More info | Oct 19, 2009 11:27 | #18 Victoria Bampton wrote in post #8828918 7d support isn't final yet - it's only beta support, so there's more work to do yet. I will be glad when they have something more official as the LR2.5 profile labeled "beta" is really off from what I'm seeing in camera / in DPP.
Copy them to, respectively:
2. Open the DCP in any hex editor
3. Find the profile label at the top of the file (e.g. "Canon EOS 50D") and type over it with "Canon EOS 7D". In my case, the "50D" was 1 char longer so just replace the extra chars with "00" on the hex side of the screen. Make sure to name this exactly right as I believe it is this label that LR uses to match up with the camera model in the metadata. IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] 4. Save it. 5. Repeat for the Adobe Standard and each Camera profile. 6. Assuming you placed the files in the correct folder, named them correctly and updated each of camera labels, you should now have additional profiles for 7D images: IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] I'd be interested in hearing if anyone has better success with 50D profiles, 5D Mark II profiles, or any others. In my experience, they still aren't quite right but a step better than the "beta" profile. Much less warm for sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 19, 2009 13:45 | #19 mckamey wrote in post #8851031 What I've done is to use a hex editor to replace the label inside the 50D profiles and they seem to do a better job than the "beta". I wasn't sure if 5D Mark II would be closer to 7D or 50D. I didn't see much difference so I went with 50D. Both seem to be better than the initial support. Here's the steps if anyone wants to try it out Cool! I know what I'll be doing tomorrow. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alanwoo Member 131 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Canberra / Melbourne More info | Oct 19, 2009 18:31 | #20 imported a whole set of photos last night. half of the 7d photos coming up in LR as beta, another half not working at all, but work in DPP. Anyone experienced this?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 19, 2009 18:58 | #21 alanwoo wrote in post #8853624 imported a whole set of photos last night. half of the 7d photos coming up in LR as beta, another half not working at all, but work in DPP. Anyone experienced this? Are they all full RAW, or did you use mRaw/sRaw? With bridge i'd say try clearing the cache, the same may be true of LR. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alanwoo Member 131 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Canberra / Melbourne More info | Oct 19, 2009 19:19 | #22 Thats it! yeah I switched to sRaw near end of wedding! So sRaw on 7D not supported on Lightroom 2.5 then.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 19, 2009 19:20 | #23 Nope, fingers crossed for the next release. I don't much like DPP so for the few mRaw I took I just batched them straight to jpeg, chose my keepers, then only processed the best ones. Even then I batched to TIFF then tweaked in ACR. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 19, 2009 21:09 | #24 hollis_f wrote in post #8840001 If you'd have cropped an 800 pixel wide chuck from the image you could have posted that without resizing - that's known as a 100% crop. Thank you for the clarification. mckamey wrote in post #8851031 I will be glad when they have something more official as the LR2.5 profile labeled "beta" is really off from what I'm seeing in camera / in DPP. ... Wow. That's one hell of an introductory post. I love it! https://photography-on-the.net …?p=8681946&postcount=1961Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dawei213 Senior Member 377 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Philadelphia, PA More info | Oct 25, 2009 13:16 | #25 Just saw this post... yeah, my images with my 7D in LR is much more warmer than OP's. In LR: BTW, love that I can shoot 3200 ISO and still have good noise control. 7D | 17-55 | 24-105 f4L IS | Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS | 580EX II | 7MDH | An extremely light wallet now...:p
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 01, 2009 07:13 | #26 hollis_f wrote in post #8851931 Cool! I know what I'll be doing tomorrow. Well, it took me a week longer to get around to it but it was totally painless and the results look good. It'll do me until we get full support. If anybody wants to download the profiles (if you're not sure about playing around with a hex editor) then I could stick them somewhere. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1049 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||