This is the finished product. Let me know what you think. I used a gold reflector and 580ex for fill.
AlanMura Senior Member 632 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Oct 16, 2009 01:29 | #2 Hey Reefergal, Nice photo, but do you have a higher quality image? This one appears grainy/pixelated (eyes etc).. ALANMURA.COM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TimPark Goldmember 1,416 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Southern California More info | Oct 16, 2009 01:35 | #3 you captured a very nice smile......but i think the main issue here is with the very busy background. i don't think there's enough separation between her and the twigs/branches. www.timparkphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbvdm Goldmember 1,081 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kenmore, NY More info | Oct 16, 2009 06:53 | #4 +1^^ Canon 5D MkII gripped, Canon 7D gripped, Canon 40D gripped, Canon XTI (IR) gripped, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 60 Macro 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS , Canon 24-105 4.0, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sekonic L-358, Canon Speedlite 580-EX II, (2)430-EX, Pocket Wizards, lots of other stuff that seems to keep growing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Oct 16, 2009 13:48 | #5 Agree that she is too close to the branches in the background. Also, too smooth on the skin processing
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A.Tan Senior Member 599 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: Southern California More info | Oct 16, 2009 16:47 | #6 I agree with most of the comments. Shallower depth of field would have helped a lot and maybe a different crop or angle. 5D MKII,17-40 f/4L, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 135mm f/2L, 70-200mm f/2.8L, 550EX, 580EXII, ST-E2, Sekonic L-358, 2 SB-26s, 3 AB800s.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Muskydave22 Goldmember 1,716 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Menomonee Falls, WI More info |
1downfall Goldmember 4,059 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2007 Location: virginia beach, va More info | Oct 16, 2009 20:21 | #8 I like it. And unfortunately agree with the crowd. I also think some "pop" is missing here. The colors don't jump out.....it looks flat. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Oct 16, 2009 23:01 | #9 Far too much skin smoothing, her face looks soft and unnatural. Your subject is slightly under exposed, you needed more flash. That's why people are saying there is no "pop" and the photo looks flat.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Foggy Senior Member 397 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | I like how Snappy recovered some of the highlights that were masked by the skin PP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 1345 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||