msowsun wrote in post #9107291
I haven't printed any images yet. Only viewed them on my Laptop screen. No, I am not really complaining. It is just an observation that the 7D LCD is much better than the 40D.
In the past I knew if an image on my 40D LCD looked good, then it would look even better on my computer monitor.
I haven't shot much with the 7D but I did notice that while shooting, many of the images that looked great on the LCD, didn't look all that great on the laptop screen.
Yes, I know that the 40D is softer (resolution-wise) than the newer models, but I was curious as to how the 7D LCD image "translate" to the final outcome, be it a print or display...
I still use a CRT (a 22" compaq) whose display is very close to my prints (closer than my laptop LCD display) because, I believe, prints are inherently softer than monitor displays in general, and that LCD displays seem to be sharper than those of CRTs ...
...all of which is to say that my "soft" 40D LCD display (set at level 7 sharpness) is VERY close to my CRT display/print output....which is what matters most to me...
My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera