I'm happy with my USM version, IS would be nice but is it necessary? Not yet...
| POLL: "Will you "upgrade" your 100mm macro non-L lens?" |
No, I'm happy with the 100mm macro (non-L) and don't think I'd getting any extra value by going to the L version. | 70 59.8% |
No, I'm happy with the 100mm macro (non-L) but only because I can't afford the L version. | 15 12.8% |
Yes, I'm going to sell (or give away) my 100mm macro (non-L) and get the L version. | 27 23.1% |
Yes, and I'm going to keep both the non-L and the L version. | 5 4.3% |
Nov 06, 2009 22:33 | #31 I'm happy with my USM version, IS would be nice but is it necessary? Not yet... Gear List:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wimg Cream of the Crop 6,982 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Netherlands, EU More info | Nov 07, 2009 12:58 | #32 I missed an "Other" option in the poll EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters, and an accessory plague
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1131 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||