Is the HD-series or the PRO 1 series Hoyas best quality filters? Hard to figure out from their own webpages so I ask you guys. Thank you for your answers beforehand!
Oct 19, 2009 13:30 | #1 Is the HD-series or the PRO 1 series Hoyas best quality filters? Hard to figure out from their own webpages so I ask you guys. Thank you for your answers beforehand! Canonman47
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maia Junior Member 24 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Porto, Portugal More info | Oct 19, 2009 16:08 | #2 Hi.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maia Junior Member 24 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Porto, Portugal More info | Oct 19, 2009 16:17 | #3 Don't know why I am having trouble editing the last post. Anyway, here's the quote from their reply to my email: Thank you for your attention and interest in Hoya filters. Please be informed that we qualify HD Series as the highest grade on our line-up. For reference,please refer to the following advantage of HD Series. -Chemically enhanced optical glass is 4x stronger than other models. -Water and oil repellent. -Scratch and stain resistant Best regards, Tokina Sales
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BroncoAZ Senior Member 393 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 19, 2009 23:40 | #4 I was under the impression that the HD were very strong and easy to clean, but the Pro 1D were better optically. I ended up buying the B+W MRC instead. Canon 60D, Canon 17-55mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS, Canon 10-22mm, Canon Extender EF 1.4x II, Canon 430EX II, B+W MRC filters, Pelican 1450 with dividers, Think Tank Digital Holster 10V2, 2011 Macbook Pro 15" i7 2.0 GHz 8GB RAM, Canon D10
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Oct 20, 2009 00:48 | #5 There is the before-digital Pro, which was a slim version CPL with light transmission at 99.7% like the SHMC, and the Digital Pro filter which was no better than the lesser HMC filter at 97%. The HD is claimed to have 99.35% transmission You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomH.Photography Senior Member 488 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Leuven, Belgium More info | Oct 20, 2009 01:29 | #6 I have both the HD and Pro 1 series. Optically I don't notice any difference at all. They are both very, very good. I always leave them on, even for night shoots. The HD is a lot more sturdy and easy to clean however, so I prefer them. 500D | 11-16 2.8 | 17-55 2.8 IS | 35 1.4 L | 135 2.0 L | 200 2.8 L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1716 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||