anyone have any experience w/ any of these? any suggestions?
powhodee Member 53 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Oct 19, 2009 19:51 | #1 anyone have any experience w/ any of these? any suggestions? Ef 16-35mm 2.8LII, ef 24-105mmL, ef 50mm 1.8, ef 70-200mm f2.8L IS II, ef85mm 1.2L mkII, 580 exII, Nikon sb-24, 5d mkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
k.lee Senior Member 395 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Oct 19, 2009 20:43 | #2 |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Oct 19, 2009 21:37 | #3 I have both but haven't done any side by side comparison. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
57hardtop Senior Member 760 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Chicago More info | Oct 19, 2009 21:45 | #4 I can add that the LastoLite Ezybox has an inner baffle and an outer diffusion panel. Roger
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Is there a reason you're limiting yourself to very small softboxes. Even taking a step up to a Photoflex 24" x 32" is a nice jump. The box gives you a long side that can be used vertically or horizontally for feathering and more control over falloff and wrap. Also, the 24" x 32" comes with an internal diffuser for more even lighting from center to edge. You can also get that softbox with either a white or silver interior and it can be used with the same photoflex bracket and speedring designed for a hot shoe flash and the 16" x 22" box. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 20, 2009 01:07 | #6 TMR Design wrote in post #8855104 I highly recommend the 24" x 32" over a 16" x 22" or a 24" square box with a single layer of diffusion. Regarding the Lastolite box. It's nice, it does have the inner baffle, but costs a lot more than the Photoflex 24" x 32". Lastolite EZYbox's are very nice but costly. hmm..i might consider what you're suggesting Robert, thanks! still alot of researching to go through Ef 16-35mm 2.8LII, ef 24-105mmL, ef 50mm 1.8, ef 70-200mm f2.8L IS II, ef85mm 1.2L mkII, 580 exII, Nikon sb-24, 5d mkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 20, 2009 01:14 | #7 I was going to ask somethingbur questioned answered... Ef 16-35mm 2.8LII, ef 24-105mmL, ef 50mm 1.8, ef 70-200mm f2.8L IS II, ef85mm 1.2L mkII, 580 exII, Nikon sb-24, 5d mkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1015 guests, 182 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||