It's a stuffed pussy, just like Nicksan. 
me
Feb 02, 2010 19:40 | #3317 Can you say that on this forum? GBRandy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2010 19:44 | #3318 Only if it's about my old pal Nicky.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sauk Goldmember  4,149 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Sandy, UT More info | Feb 02, 2010 19:52 | #3319 nicksan wrote in post #9528405  Yes, I applied my usual NR via Neat Image. Still looking to tweak it. I am not completely happy with the results I am getting. What can I say? This one likes to pose for the camera! 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Feb 02, 2010 19:57 | #3320 ^ Nicely done Nick. The noise reduction looks pretty good on my monitor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 02, 2010 19:58 | #3321 MDJAK wrote in post #9528493 Yeah, I ventured into the title fairy thread and was zapped by the avatar demons. You are a brave man.... GBRandy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonswhitelensesrule Goldmember  3,648 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Surrey, B.C. More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:01 | #3322 Awesome pics, Nick. Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart  24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:06 | #3323 Sauk wrote in post #9528542 Damn ISO 12500 is simply amazing. Can you do a few in the 8000 to 10000 range? I'll try to put something together. Probably not tonight. Maybe tomorrow. jdizzle wrote in post #9528563 ^ Nicely done Nick. The noise reduction looks pretty good on my monitor. I'm trying to play around with Nik dFine, integrating that within my NR workflow. It seems to do a better job at getting rid of color blotches (also does a decent job of getting rid of banding on 5DMKII files which is the reason why I bought it to begin with) so I figured why not tinker with it a little bit. I think I am getting better results with this than NeatImage which is an older version. Need to update it... Yeah, nothing like free right?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkubek Member 192 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Louisville More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:08 | #3324 The first cat pic almost just looks like a floating cat head!!! At least on this terrible, uncalibrated laptop I'm on at work. 1D Mk IV, 7D, XTi, 100-400L, 400 f/5.6L, 24-105L, 100mm macro, 1.4x TC, bunch of flashes, RRS BH-55, Manfrotto 055CXPro4 tripod x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:09 | #3325 dkubek wrote in post #9528631 The first cat pic almost just looks like a floating cat head!!! At least on this terrible, uncalibrated laptop I'm on at work. Well you can thank the 200L shot at f2 for that one!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkubek Member 192 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Louisville More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:10 | #3326 nicksan wrote in post #9528634 Well you can thank the 200L shot at f2 for that one! I know, that DOF is amazing!!! --or I guess lack thereof. 1D Mk IV, 7D, XTi, 100-400L, 400 f/5.6L, 24-105L, 100mm macro, 1.4x TC, bunch of flashes, RRS BH-55, Manfrotto 055CXPro4 tripod x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkubek Member 192 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Louisville More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:11 | #3327 One more post and you're at 13,000 Nicksan! 1D Mk IV, 7D, XTi, 100-400L, 400 f/5.6L, 24-105L, 100mm macro, 1.4x TC, bunch of flashes, RRS BH-55, Manfrotto 055CXPro4 tripod x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
daytonphotog Mostly Lurking  13 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Dayton Ohio More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:16 | #3328 were the cat shots done raw of jpeg? T.Paul Miller
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:18 | #3329 daytonphotog wrote in post #9528687 were the cat shots done raw of jpeg? RAW->ACR->PS CS4->JPEG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J_TULLAR Goldmember  3,011 posts Likes: 24 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Feb 02, 2010 20:32 | #3330 GMCPhotographics wrote in post #9528108 No it's not....my Canon copy is just as sharp as the Nikon variant. It's sharp wide open right through the aperture range and focal range. It's an excellent optic. The only optical defect that mine shows is a slight ponchaunt for a bit of CA. At 24mm it's almost rectilinear too, one of the best 24mm offerings in a zoom lens. The Nikon version curves it's lines a lot more than the Canon. Betwwen very good copies of both the Canon and Nikon, you would be hard pressed to tell the difference optically. I'm currently using 21mp and it's resolving very well, even wide open. Ok and thats your opinion I guess. MTF charts say other wise. And as I have shot with both and have a Nikon 24-70 at work and own a great copy canon 24-70 I still think the nikon version is sharper. Prove me wrong?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1893 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
