sooooooo... how about that mkIV?
canonnoob Cream of the Crop  8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Dec 20, 2009 14:31 | #1246 sooooooo... how about that mkIV? David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
T.D. Moderator  More info | Dec 20, 2009 14:37 | #1247 Folks, the political comments have been deleted.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember  4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Dec 20, 2009 17:26 | #1248 J_TULLAR wrote in post #9233554  Not sure if this has been posted already http://www.flickr.com/photos/despeaux/ iso examples for 1d4 sweet Jebus. They look fantastic! 1600 looks very very clean.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SPORTshot Senior Member 440 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Ohio More info | Dec 20, 2009 17:52 | #1249 AdamJL wrote in post #9234702 sweet Jebus. They look fantastic! 1600 looks very very clean.
James
LOG IN TO REPLY |
butterfly2937 Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 20, 2009 18:09 | #1250 SPORTshot wrote in post #9234846 LOL, 51,200 looks like 6400 on my 50D ! +1 I am so hoping this camera performs in real life like everyone here is hoping! If it does it will be a winner and I think allot of people will be standing in line to get one. I'll probably be one of them!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien  12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Dec 20, 2009 18:55 | #1251 J_TULLAR wrote in post #9233554 Not sure if this has been posted already http://www.flickr.com/photos/despeaux/ iso examples for 1d4 Sweet. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sjay770 Member  52 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Houston More info | Dec 20, 2009 19:52 | #1252 J_TULLAR wrote in post #9233554 Not sure if this has been posted already http://www.flickr.com/photos/despeaux/ iso examples for 1d4 It looks like Canon was shipping out the pr-production Mark IV this december as I see more and more samples from it. www.ojfotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fidelity Senior Member 346 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:15 | #1253 Depending on what the RAW files look like processed with no NR, Canon may have been conservative when they claimed only one stop better RAW ISO than the 1D Mark III and 2 stops better JPG ISO. Fidelity
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop"  57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:18 | #1254 Fidelity wrote in post #9235778 Depending on what the RAW files look like processed with no NR, Canon may have been conservative when they claimed only one stop better RAW ISO than the 1D Mark III and 2 stops better JPG ISO. Now, what possible reason could Canon have for not "overstating" things? I mean, it's not like they've had any former claims bite them in the collective keester, right? Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart  24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:18 | #1255 Fidelity wrote in post #9235778 Depending on what the RAW files look like processed with no NR, Canon may have been conservative when they claimed only one stop better RAW ISO than the 1D Mark III and 2 stops better JPG ISO. Pretty amazing, isn't it?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:38 | #1256 Dayum! Those high ISOs from 6400 and up are pretty damn good. Now, I'm all confused. 1D MK IV or 1Ds MK IV?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DwightMcCann so, what are we talking about?  21,402 posts Likes: 44 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Buellton, California, USA More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:40 | #1257 jdizzle wrote in post #9235925 Dayum! Those high ISOs from 6400 and up are pretty damn good. Now, I'm all confused. 1D MK IV or 1Ds MK IV?  Both, as they come available. Dwight McCann
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Dec 20, 2009 21:52 | #1258 Hehe! I would love both but, I barely shoot lowlight. FF is where it's at for me. If the next 1Ds is capable like the 5D MK II in lowlight, I'm in line!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LoganJ Member 174 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: San Diego More info | Dec 20, 2009 22:17 | #1259 jdizzle wrote in post #9235925 Dayum! Those high ISOs from 6400 and up are pretty damn good. Now, I'm all confused. 1D MK IV or 1Ds MK IV? From my understaind 1D is more of a sports camera and the 1Ds is more of a studio camera. Canon 50D w/ Grip | 17-40mm f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 60mm f/2.8 USM Macro | 70-200mm f/4L | 580EX II w/ Sto-Fen OmniBounce | Manfrotto 055XPROB legs w/ 488RC2 head | PocketWizard Mini TT1 & Flex TT5 |Sekonic L-358
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Dec 20, 2009 22:35 | #1260 LoganJ wrote in post #9236170 From my understaind 1D is more of a sports camera and the 1Ds is more of a studio camera. I do know that the 1D is a sports camera. I used to own a 1D MK III and after using it, I really didn't need it. I'm sticking to FF from now on since most of my shooting is landscapes. If I ever decide to go into birding, the 1D MK IV would be the perfect choice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1876 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
