JVS wrote in post #8888980
Oh man... I know it's tough to remove the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS from your camera as I do have a very hard time also... but if you seriously do "dangerous wildlife" shot like these, get a lens with a longer reach!
I actually had a Canon 10-22mm lens on my 50D for taking fall foliage panoramas... My 30D had the Canon 24-70mm lens for macro and fall foliage too.
My long birding lens, the 400mm F/5.6L was left at home... I usually need to use a tripod with it, cause of the low light and long shadows of the dense forest floor...
I'm reluctant to carry all my "L" glass and $7-8 grand worth of gear into public places... So the my 400mm birding lens stayed in a gun safe at home.
That day I was primarily taking photos of horses on a friends farm and after ward I tried my luck at panoramas at the park lake... On the way home, I made one more stop to take a panorama of some trees, when from a distance, another Canon photographer waved me over, to tell me she had previously spotted a sizable black bear.
After talking to her, I had to walk another 75 yrds. back to my truck to get my longest lens with me at the time... I actually wished that I had a Canon 1.4x or 2.0x doubler... It's small and very functional in these situations...
Now I wish I had already purchased the doublers... so that's how this went down...
Thereafter, I walked toward the last sighting of the bear, while ducking out behind trees... After a while, I spotted him, and walking upwind while hiding behind trees, I got close enough for these snaps...
So to answer your ques., I have a long telephoto lens, It just doesn't fit with all of the other gear, and it often requires my tripod. All, would have been too bulky for panoramas and horses that day.