Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 01 Jun 2005 (Wednesday) 23:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

!! BEWARE !! - The butterfly hunter

 
kawter2
Goldmember
Avatar
2,046 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 01, 2005 23:25 |  #1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'



anyone own the 70-200 IS? Is there a sweet spot? I'm shootin this thing WIDE OPEN and IS on all the time.. any feedback


Wedding Blog (external link)
Eric J. Weddings (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buginajar
Member
63 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Jun 01, 2005 23:46 |  #2

Send me yours and I'll test it out for you!!

Seriously though, gorgeous photos. Both are great compositions, but I'm partial to the second one.Great colors, saturation, and bokeh, bokeh, bokeh. That lens ...err your photography skills are amazing!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Jun 01, 2005 23:47 |  #3

Looks pretty sweet at those settings!


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawter2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,046 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 01, 2005 23:53 |  #4

thanks guys!! dante I could have sworn that you got this lens in that little lens purchasing expedition you were on a few weeks back.. any how..

here is a 100% (4.5 @ 650 Is on ISO.800 145mm)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


Wedding Blog (external link)
Eric J. Weddings (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawter2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,046 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 02, 2005 00:06 |  #5

BTW - Dante.. I actuallly thought of you when naming this thread!!! I always but up at your titles!



Wedding Blog (external link)
Eric J. Weddings (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jun 02, 2005 00:22 |  #6

kawter - 70-200 should be very sharp wide open, and a sample that I've had was as sharp as it gets at 3.5 and up...

But I would not hesitate to use it wide open if you want to blur the background.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kawter2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,046 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 02, 2005 00:25 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #7

DocFrankenstein wrote:
kawter - 70-200 should be very sharp wide open, and a sample that I've had was as sharp as it gets at 3.5 and up...

But I would not hesitate to use it wide open if you want to blur the background.


Thanks DOC!! that is what i was thinking.. BTW should i turn off IS if i am getting SS over say 400? or does it matter?



Wedding Blog (external link)
Eric J. Weddings (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fortinaa
Senior Member
Avatar
728 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Detroit, MI (suburbs)
     
Jun 02, 2005 05:27 as a reply to  @ kawter2's post |  #8

Nice shots. She sure does look determined! I've got that lens as well, and don't hesitate to shoot at F2.8. It'll still be sharper than most consumer lenses at F8 (in my experience). I often do stop down a tad for shooting at close range though, as DOF is very thin for a portrait taken at about 12ft away.


Aaron

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eljustino
Member
245 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: London
     
Jun 05, 2005 16:03 |  #9

lens looks A1, pictures are just great!!!


Justin Keery. 20D, 17-85 IS, 70-300 IS and f1.8 "nifty fifty". OK so I've got the equipment right at last, time to focus entirely on the photography!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raleighnc
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Raleigh, N.C.
     
Jun 05, 2005 16:33 |  #10

They look great !!

Rog


350D
50 1/4
17-85 USM
17-40L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muffin ­ Princess
Member
Avatar
169 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: West Bromwich
     
Jun 05, 2005 17:09 |  #11

The only reason you'd need to turn off your IS is that it eats battery like anything! I only use it when absolutely necessary. Then again, I am rather proud of my steady hand! (I can hand hold at 1.5 seconds.....*ahem* :P)


Canon 40D, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.8, Canon Speedlite 430EX
www.eclipseimages.co.u​k (external link), Twitter: @eclipse_images (external link)
Facebook: www.facebook.com/eclip​seimages (external link)
Trekking for WSPA: Sponsorship page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DwightMcCann
so, what are we talking about?
Avatar
21,402 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Buellton, California, USA
     
Jun 05, 2005 18:33 |  #12

Just get a second battery and keep 'em charging in rotation! These are excellent.


Dwight McCann
Website (external link) - Facebook (external link)
Gear List - Concert FAQ - My Small Studio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Jun 05, 2005 18:59 |  #13

Used this lens yesterday. 3200 ISO f/2.8
From the proper distance, it was sharp sharp sharp; albeit a tad noisy in the low light. Too close, and I had some DOF problems.
Frankly, I'm still learning the beast. 8-)

Outstanding photos! Nice composition.


Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,137 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
!! BEWARE !! - The butterfly hunter
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2113 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.