Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 02 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 09:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Opinion Please

 
smudge
Senior Member
432 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: London
     
Jun 02, 2005 09:06 |  #1

Is this portrait acceptable. Or is it TOO bright in places.
Personally, I like it. But does it fall within the boundaries of OK...photographically ?

Many Thanks.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by PICTURETRAIL

...it's arrived and it's in English...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCB
Senior Member
Avatar
668 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Boston, Mass.
     
Jun 02, 2005 09:22 |  #2

I'm no authority on what's photographically ok, but I like it a lot. Good job!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buginajar
Member
63 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Jun 02, 2005 09:30 |  #3

I'm no professional either, but it seems good to me. He seems to be thinking "you talkin' to me?"

One thing that does bother me though, is the shallow DOF. His ears are out of focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djonto
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Staffordshire, England
     
Jun 02, 2005 09:33 |  #4

Looks OK to me


Dave

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boomerang
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Jun 02, 2005 09:45 |  #5

I think it looks great, you overcame the hardest part which is nice bokeh around the outer face but the eyes are sharp.


Francesco
Canon 7D
50mm 1.4 : 50mm 1.8 : 17-40L : 70-200 2.8L IS
vertical grip : mountainsmith

http://francesco.blogp​hotography.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chaitu
Member
73 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Machu Pichu
     
Jun 02, 2005 11:01 |  #6

hey... this a warm n bright portrait . i like it. is this the original size or was it cropped?


"Some people never go crazy... what truly horrible lives they must lead" ~The Buk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 02, 2005 11:19 |  #7

I like the photo. It's warm and personable but I ran it thru Neat Image and like the softer skin tones that produces. The image is a classic to start with IMO, color, composition, focus, and no, I don't think it's too bright anywhere.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Barb42
Senior Member
Avatar
775 posts
Joined May 2003
Location: Minnesota
     
Jun 02, 2005 11:47 |  #8

Its a good photo but pulling back for more dof would improve it - I would like to see the ears in focus. Good subject, great expression, and could be the perfect model for years.


http://www.barbsmithph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jal
Member
49 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Pacific NorthWest
     
Jun 02, 2005 12:28 |  #9

keep it the way it is. Looks good.


regards,
Jal
canon EOS 20D
www.viewmyevent.com (external link)
www.pbase.com/jal (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skyphix
Senior Member
404 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: South Glens Falls, NY
     
Jun 02, 2005 12:52 as a reply to  @ MCB's post |  #10

MCB wrote:
I'm no authority on what's photographically ok, but I like it a lot. Good job!


Said it better than I could've.


Eric
Digital:
Hacked 300D, BG-E1
Film:
Lost, broken, beat Rebel G that was my first SLR - FOUND!!
EOS 650
Yashica Electro 35 GSN
Lenses
18-55 EF-S
Surprisingly good 35-80 F4-5.6 III
50mm 1.8 Mk1
70-210 F4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dawn
Member
52 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Jun 02, 2005 14:40 |  #11

I, absolutely, have no authority of stating what's photographically ok or not - I just know what I like and what makes me continue looking at a photo and this one, I like looking at and smiling at the little boy.

I am intrigued by portraits that display something more than a group of people smiling at the camera in a posed shot (I'll never be able to photograph a wedding, LOL) and this one feels like you captured a moment and get to keep it safe, forever.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smudge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
432 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: London
     
Jun 02, 2005 21:49 |  #12

Thank you all very much. Obviously I love it, he's my son. I just wondered whether or not it would be acceptable to produce this kind of shot for someone else. It's easy to look at your own kids and say, wow what a gorgeous shot and of course all of your close family and friends agree.

But if paid to take shots would someone else find this kind of informal portrait acceptable, considering A the blown highlights on the shirt, B the unposed aspect. The reason I ask is because someone has asked me to take some shots of their kids, but in their words...not the norm... I dunno maybe I'll just do lots of different stuff and let them choose. Just trying to think ahead.


...it's arrived and it's in English...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 03, 2005 05:28 |  #13

I don't like this photo so much. The angle makes his forehead look a little large, and things are out of proportion. I'd probably stand back a little and use a longer lens. That's just my taste though.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smudge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
432 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: London
     
Jun 03, 2005 05:32 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #14

Thanks Tim. I was thinking of getting the 85mm1.8 or maybe even the 85mm1.2L for this kind of thing would that kind of focal length help lessen the distortion/ proportions. If so is there really a thousand pounds worth of difference in quality between those two lenses?


...it's arrived and it's in English...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,950 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Opinion Please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1275 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.