I took a ton of photos at the Atlanta Zoo the other day, and I expected all of them to be excellent (yeah, right), but even though I knew I'd have many bad ones, it seemed to me that most were bad.
Oh well, here are a few that I'm fairly happy with, although they are not razor sharp.
Would a tripod make a big difference? Should I consider one? These are taken from a Rebel XS and a 100-400 F/4.5-5.6 L USM IS). Great camera and lens, but not so great photographer.
How many of you would use a tripod in these situations?
Keep in mind that each photo was sharpened beyond reasonably to make them work.
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
Thank you. 