gasrocks Cream of the Crop  13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Oct 28, 2009 15:10 | #1 |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop"  57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Oct 28, 2009 15:12 | #2 Very Interesting... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimes Goldmember 1,323 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2006 More info | Oct 28, 2009 15:13 | #3 interesting...although just because there is a patent on the idea, dosen't mean that it will be produced. Would be cool though! Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamJL Goldmember  4,365 posts Likes: 13 Joined May 2006 Location: 'Straya More info | Oct 28, 2009 15:48 | #4 |
KarlJohnston Cream of the Crop 9,334 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Oct 28, 2009 16:40 | #5  Permanent banI think they should do a 12-24 just to put on above Nikon Adventurous Photographer, Writer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Oct 28, 2009 16:53 | #6 Canon already has a hand in creating a 14mm optic and a 24mm optic. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poe Goldmember  1,956 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto, CA More info | Oct 29, 2009 00:48 | #7 From looking over the patent document, it seems that there are 4 designs; 2 seem to be zooms and the other 2 appear to be primes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BCBryce Member 103 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Hmm, that would be nice. I just don't think my Visa would appreciate it that much if it comes out. Bryce Burnip Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 29, 2009 08:00 | #9 A 14-24 or 12-24 would be ideal for this type of lens if ever made by Canon. I'd ditch my 16-35 II in a heartbeat.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poe Goldmember 1,956 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto, CA More info | Oct 29, 2009 17:05 | #10 While I would like to see a new f/2.8 zoom, maybe there will be a new f/4 zoom. I could definately go for something like that as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poe Goldmember 1,956 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto, CA More info | Oct 29, 2009 17:06 | #11 jdizzle wrote in post #8916951  A 14-24 or 12-24 would be ideal for this type of lens if ever made by Canon. I'd ditch my 16-35 II in a heartbeat.  The price tag will definitely be around Nikon's 14-24. Give or take a few hundred. If you compare the diagrams with the 14-24G cutaway on KR's site, you'll see the diagrams have a number of additional elements, so I'm expecting some hefty price tags if these designs come to fruition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackshadow Mr T. from the A team  5,732 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Melbourne, VIC Australia More info | Oct 29, 2009 17:24 | #12 jdizzle wrote in post #8916951 A 14-24 or 12-24 would be ideal for this type of lens if ever made by Canon. I'd ditch my 16-35 II in a heartbeat. The price tag will definitely be around Nikon's 14-24. Give or take a few hundred. I'd be ditching my 16-35II as well. Black Shadow Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 29, 2009 17:33 | #13 jdizzle wrote in post #8916951 A 14-24 or 12-24 would be ideal for this type of lens if ever made by Canon. I'd ditch my 16-35 II in a heartbeat. The price tag will definitely be around Nikon's 14-24. Give or take a few hundred. blackshadow wrote in post #8920197 I'd be ditching my 16-35II as well. And I'd pick up one of your used 16-35Ls on the cheap. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:42 | #14 No problemo Don.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:50 | #15 Poe wrote in post #8920095 While I would like to see a new f/2.8 zoom, maybe there will be a new f/4 zoom. I could definately go for something like that as well. A constant f/4 is doable in my books.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 943 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
too