Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Oct 2009 (Wednesday) 19:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help!! Worse-case scenario...

 
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 29, 2009 13:39 |  #16

katodog wrote in post #8915104 (external link)
Not to be a smartass, but even Jesus Himself couldn't photograph in there without setting up lighting, and He wouldn't be able to set up lighting. I think this might be one of those rare times when I should just shoot Auto and forget that I know anything about photography.

shoot RAW. you mention that it doesn't work, but it will give you more latitude to work with. underexpose if you have to, but make sure you have an acceptable shutter speed. then, pull up in post. it'll be noisier, but at least you'll get sharp pictures out of it.


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spkerer
Senior Member
Avatar
953 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA USA
     
Oct 29, 2009 19:27 |  #17

I sometimes shoot in some pretty miserable settings. I +1 the opinions expressed earlier about doing what you can to eliminate blur. I much prefer a high ISO noisier picture without blur than a less noisy but blurry picture. And try your flash at a higher ISO - you'll be amazed how powerful your flash becomes then!


Leesburg, Virginia
http://photos.kusterer​s.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nouks
Senior Member
Avatar
824 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
     
Oct 30, 2009 06:05 |  #18

Use *way* higher ISO. Nothing is worse than this kind of movement. If ISO 3200 is necessary, use it. Both with your 20D and your 40D.

Use on longest 1/80 for walk, on longest 1/200 but better 1/320 or shorter for trot and canter.

Custom white balance is best, but not really great when light from outside falls in (through the door). So try to avoid that door when decently white balanced. Shoot RAW to be able to correct WB afterwards.

If you have enough light available to use a smaller aperture or lower your ISO, *first* use a smaller aperture. Lack of DOF is the most-seen mistake IMO.


Oh, and try to take photos at lighter days and avoid rainy/cloudy days and evenings, that really helps a lot!


I used to be Gebruikersnaam.
Gearlist: 1D2, resurrected 20D, 400D, 16-35L, 28-70L, 70-200L, 85 F1.8, cute 18-55, dead 24-70 Siggie, 2 flashlights, expensive bags and loads of CF-cards.
Website (external link)Portfolio (external link)Archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1682
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Oct 30, 2009 06:59 |  #19

Thanks everyone. Got a lot to work on I guess.

I can't really pick the time of day to shoot, she has a lesson the same time of day, 4:30 p.m.. I'm at the mercy of the winter season and the fact that it's gonna be getting darker earlier. Light is going to be what it is, and I have to find the best way to work around it.

I'll shoot ISO1600 or high ISO with the 40D, and try the flash again. And I will, reluctantly, shoot RAW. Can't hurt I guess. Problem is the next lesson is in two weeks, so you guys will have to wait for the results.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nouks
Senior Member
Avatar
824 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
     
Oct 30, 2009 07:03 |  #20

katodog wrote in post #8923198 (external link)
Thanks everyone. Got a lot to work on I guess.

I can't really pick the time of day to shoot, she has a lesson the same time of day, 4:30 p.m.. I'm at the mercy of the winter season and the fact that it's gonna be getting darker earlier. Light is going to be what it is, and I have to find the best way to work around it.

Yeah okay but even in wintertime you've got dark days and light days. And it really makes a great difference, trust me on that. So if it's dark and grey maybe just leave your camera at home and see what's the weather like the week after.


I used to be Gebruikersnaam.
Gearlist: 1D2, resurrected 20D, 400D, 16-35L, 28-70L, 70-200L, 85 F1.8, cute 18-55, dead 24-70 Siggie, 2 flashlights, expensive bags and loads of CF-cards.
Website (external link)Portfolio (external link)Archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Oct 30, 2009 08:57 |  #21

katodog wrote in post #8923198 (external link)
Thanks everyone. Got a lot to work on I guess.

I can't really pick the time of day to shoot, she has a lesson the same time of day, 4:30 p.m.. I'm at the mercy of the winter season and the fact that it's gonna be getting darker earlier. Light is going to be what it is, and I have to find the best way to work around it.

I'll shoot ISO1600 or high ISO with the 40D, and try the flash again. And I will, reluctantly, shoot RAW. Can't hurt I guess. Problem is the next lesson is in two weeks, so you guys will have to wait for the results.

Why reluctantly? If you shoot RAW you can underexpose by up to 2 stops and still manage to recover the details. Yes you might have noise on the photo but that can be dealt with by Noise ninja/Noiseware etc.

You state earlier in your post that RAW doesnt give more latitude than Jpeg - that statement is just plain WRONG. If thats your findings then you are doing womething wrong because everyone esle that i know that uses RAW can get more latitude out of it! It will also allow you to get a "decent" WB - it might not be perfect but you could get a lot better than that green look! And that is without degrading the image quality (unlike using Jpeg).

What have you used to process RAWs in the past? DPP/ ACR or something else? DPP and ACR will both give very good results if used properly.

Main thing though would be shoot at whatever ISO gives you a useable shutter speed. Noise can be dealt with (removed or minimised) but motion blur is impossible to remove.


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Oct 30, 2009 09:43 as a reply to  @ neilwood32's post |  #22

You have your image editing allowed, and this is a brief excursion into PS

IMAGE: http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l383/chauncey43/testy.jpg

I might submit that, in addition to the opinions previously advanced, your white balance needs some adjustments.
My "clicking" on one of those window "shutters" produced this. The skin tone RGB ratios are now pretty descent.

The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Oct 30, 2009 09:51 |  #23

I would echo what lots of folks are saying here. People do shoot in arenas all the time, and while you're not going to get the quality you get outdoors in the spring, you can at least get some keepers.

1. Shoot Manual. I can't stress this enough. I shot for a while in AV, and it's just wrong. If the horse passes in front of a white fence, he gets darker. If he passes in front of a dark area, he gets blurry. Bad news.
2. Set custom white balance - it's not rocket science, just shoot a pic of a white piece of paper under the light.
3. Use all your ISO - you're trading off speckles against shots that are blurry - that's the wrong decision.
4. You've got a huge advantage over a lot of us that aren't allowed flash!

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nouks
Senior Member
Avatar
824 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
     
Oct 30, 2009 10:56 |  #24

tracknut, trust me on this... You don't even want to use flash in this case.

- Flash is only helpful when used to create *better* lighting instead of *more* lighting.
- Horses might not like the flashes.
- HUGE difference between white balance under this kind of lighting conditions and color temperature of the flash. So the only case in which flash would help without ruining colors, is by using the right color filter.


I used to be Gebruikersnaam.
Gearlist: 1D2, resurrected 20D, 400D, 16-35L, 28-70L, 70-200L, 85 F1.8, cute 18-55, dead 24-70 Siggie, 2 flashlights, expensive bags and loads of CF-cards.
Website (external link)Portfolio (external link)Archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Oct 30, 2009 11:18 |  #25

Nouks wrote in post #8924246 (external link)
tracknut, trust me on this... You don't even want to use flash in this case.

Thanks for the info. I can't use flashes, but he said he's done it successfully with horses so I thought it might be a good plan. Sounds like not...

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 30, 2009 11:30 |  #26

katodog wrote in post #8923198 (external link)
I'll shoot ISO1600 or high ISO with the 40D, and try the flash again.

The shutter speeds you were at were hopeless. You can get a correct exposure in this arena at ISO3200, f/1.8 and 1/100. If you insist on shooting ambient then that is what I would do.

If you want to try blended with flash, go ISO3200, f/1.8 and 1/200 though this will require gelling the flash.

Or kill the ambient altogether and shoot ISO1600, f/2.2 and 1/200. It looks to me like the walls are white. Have you tried bouncing off the walls?

And I will, reluctantly, shoot RAW. Can't hurt I guess. Problem is the next lesson is in two weeks, so you guys will have to wait for the results.

I cannot understand the aversion to RAW given the unholy WB issues in the posted shots. The number one best reason to shoot in RAW is that it allows limitless color tweaking in post processing. Once that awful color is compressed in a JPEG you will typically find it impossible to get all the tones to look correct.

Shoot RAW and fix your color problem.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alessandro2009
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Italy
     
Oct 31, 2009 02:50 |  #27

The OP has received a lot of good suggestions, now i would like see new shoot. ;)

1) In general, never do blur shoot, because these type of shoot are irrecuperable (so put attention to have a sufficient shutter speed).
2) Always raw especially when there are possible problem with white balance.
3) A good crop don't hurt, so when is necessary, do some crop.
4) If you could use some ligth, use it, unfortunately the camera haven't the same capacity of the human eyes so you should help the camera in some manner ...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1682
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Oct 31, 2009 08:17 |  #28

Thanks everyone. I have to wait until the next shoot to see what happens.

I can use a flash, in fact, I can set up two flash units with my triggers if need be. I might do that and bounce them off the walls. I'd figure they would give good coverage at least to a certain distance. To be honest, I never thought of bouncing the walls. That's why I asked here, because I knew sooner or later somebody would come up with ideas that I was either forgetting about or didn't know about. If I had my head out of my butt when I was shooting I would have tried the walls, but the thought never crossed my mind. I got to the point where I was defeating myself before even pressing the shutter. I don't think the horses pay much attention to the flash, I've used direct flash right at them and they don't seem to flinch. I always ask beforehand if i can use a flash, just in case the trainers decide not to let me.

I am going to shoot higher ISO and RAW, and will probably bring some gels with to test. I think I have to give up on distance shots though, which is gonna suck because a lot of the time she's in the back where I can't get to. I might ask them if I can get inside the arena and shoot from the middle somewhere, maybe the light is better inside instead of shooting from the side.

now i would like see new shoot.



About a week and a half, next lesson is on the 4th.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1682
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Nov 04, 2009 13:49 |  #29

Okay guys, I'm shooting another riding lesson today, so I'll post back later with the results. I'm writing down the suggestions so I don't forget to try anything.

You've got a huge advantage over a lot of us that aren't allowed flash!



As long as they let me, and the horses aren't bothered, I'm going to use a flash. If I thought it wouldn't be totally obnoxious of me, I'd set up two units with triggers. But, I think that might be stretching the good will of the trainers, and the patience of the horses.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1682
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Nov 04, 2009 14:42 |  #30

Oops, I goofed. It sucks getting old. The lesson is on the 11th, so you guys have to wait another week.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,198 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Help!! Worse-case scenario...
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2815 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.