Does anyone know anything about this lens? I found a used one but Iwasn't sure if it would mount to a 40D.
Apollo.11 Goldmember 1,845 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Oct 29, 2009 11:50 | #1 Does anyone know anything about this lens? I found a used one but Iwasn't sure if it would mount to a 40D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Oct 29, 2009 12:10 | #2 Not sure 24 qualifies as super wide. What is the entire name of this lens? Some older SIgma will not work on newer bodies. Or, a link to the one you saw. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 29, 2009 15:07 | #3 As far as I know, Sigma 24mm f/2.8 Super-Wide Macro Lens, is the name. Yeah 24 isn't very wide, but I was interested in a 24 prime for a crop camera (and it's cheap). Because it's called "super-wide" I'm afraid it's an old film mount and won't fit my 40D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | If it's an autofocus Canon mount, it will "fit".
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2009 11:55 | #5 egordon99 wrote in post #8923730 If it's really old, it might not "work" (so you might have to use manual focus/shoot wide open) even if it mounts. You can shoot 24mm @ f/2.8 with your 17-55, so not sure what you'd be gaining, but it's your money ![]() And 24mm isn't that much different than 30mm (since you have the 30/1.4) Yeah, I think I'd have to manual focus on it. The only reason I was interested was the guy only wanted $40. You're right, I have plenty good glass in that focal range. I passed on the lens. Thanks for the input.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Oct 30, 2009 12:00 | #6 Are you sure? I'm trying to calculate the odds that an old 24/2.8 lens at $40. will be sharper than your 17-55/2.8 IS lens. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2009 12:18 | #7 gasrocks wrote in post #8924598 Are you sure? I'm trying to calculate the odds that an old 24/2.8 lens at $40. will be sharper than your 17-55/2.8 IS lens. Agreed. I didn't buy the lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
helenachh Member 106 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Canada More info | Apr 12, 2010 22:54 | #8 I just received this lens today. It works nicely on the 20D. I do see that many people as well as myself have experienced that any aperture other than 2.8 displays "Error 99," which I feel is the only short coming so far.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jam.radonc Goldmember 1,187 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Dublin More info | Apr 13, 2010 06:49 | #9 I got it recently on eBay for 31 euros. Soft wide open needing to dial in +7 on my 5DII for accurate focusing. Noisy as anything but what do you expect for an ageing lens. Why did I buy it? Was a good idea at the time but i won't be using this at all. Vignetting is bad too. I guess it's my next lens to open up and see what's inside. Jam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1649 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||