Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 29 Oct 2009 (Thursday) 13:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What Aspect Ratio and Image Size to Deliver?

 
cpforyou
Senior Member
283 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Oct 29, 2009 13:32 |  #1

Canon Digital SLR Cameras will take pictures in a 3:2 aspect ratio.

Naturally, I would think that if you need to crop out the pictures, you would do it at a 3:2 aspect ratio as well.

I ran into a photographer who told me he always crop his pictures and deliver it to his client in a 4:3 aspect ratio, the same as P&S cameras. His claim is that it is "industry standard" and that it is easier for the customers because they are already used to printing 4:3 pictures through Costco, Walmart, etc.

So this leads me to wondering and wanting to know what aspect ratio most of you deliver your pictures in?

Also, if you are a photographer who provide high-resolution images, what does that mean to you?

For me, I downsize all my images down to 3504 x 2336 (8 megapixel), regardless if I'm shooting with a 1D Mark IIn, a Canon 50D, or my Canon 5D. I consider that to be "high-resolution" in today's standard still. If I have to crop, I also crop to 3:2 aspect ratio. That way, all of my images are consistent.

Any other photographers care to chime in?


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Oct 29, 2009 13:38 |  #2

I deliver prints in whatever size customers order them, and I deliver jpegs in whatever crop looks best for the image (i.e. I don't try to make it 2:3 or any other aspect ratio). I tell my customers that my "large jpegs" are anywhere from 2000-2400 pixels on the long side, and that's the largest I deliver. I don't give anyone the full image out of the camera.

The key, IMO, is to make sure your customers know what they're ordering, so there aren't any surprises.

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpforyou
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
283 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Oct 29, 2009 13:44 |  #3

tracknut wrote in post #8918903 (external link)
I deliver prints in whatever size customers order them, and I deliver jpegs in whatever crop looks best for the image (i.e. I don't try to make it 2:3 or any other aspect ratio). I tell my customers that my "large jpegs" are anywhere from 2000-2400 pixels on the long side, and that's the largest I deliver. I don't give anyone the full image out of the camera.

The key, IMO, is to make sure your customers know what they're ordering, so there aren't any surprises.

Dave

If that's the case, when they take those JPEGs and want to print a bunch of 4x6s, if your aspect is variable for each JPEG, that means they will have to crop all those pictures that are not 3:2.

Yes, the key is to make sure it is communicated. I make it already known that I deliver 8 megapixel images, so there is no surprise.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
Oct 29, 2009 13:55 |  #4

Exactly. In my case, my jpeg sales are not for the customer to be able to make prints, they're for web sites, emailing around, background images, etc. If they want prints, they order prints from me.

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebishopp
Goldmember
1,903 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Oct 29, 2009 14:14 |  #5

I tend to use a 7:5 (5x7).

On an interesting side and historical note, my understanding of the whole 3:2 ratio is that it was the format chosen by Oskar Barnak. Some think he chose it because it has the closests porportions to the "golden rectangle".

Though for me, for some reason, I do not much like 4x6's and prefer the 5x7 (7:5 or closest to it).


"Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 29, 2009 14:27 |  #6

I use a variety of crops, as the image dictates. When I'm generating thumbnails for image review, I'll usually use 2:3 and 4:5, but occasionally others such as 16:9 or whatever happens to look best. This is sort of a "recommended crop" at this point. I try to work with relatively standardized crops/sizes, to make matting and framing easier. Sometimes an image simply has to be custom cropped, matted and framed, but that just adds a lot of cost.

After the customer orders, I'll recrop as necessary in order to accomodate what they want.

I try to allow some room to crop images when shooting. I also make a point of cropping most images at least a little, before showing them to customers. Usually that helps avoid problems with orders, where impossible crops are requested (even though they can simply preview their order and see how it's going to crop!).


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,351 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1356
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Oct 29, 2009 14:56 as a reply to  @ amfoto1's post |  #7

I also crop as the image dictates, and always have, even with film.

But something I did with film is much easier in digital. I can create a self-mat in Photoshop by expanding the canvas to fill out the format from my image cropping to the standard size. So I can give them an 8x10 with my custom 3x8 in the center surrounded by a thin line and a black mat.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Oct 30, 2009 09:46 |  #8

His claim is that it is "industry standard"
&
I also crop as the image dictates, and always have, even with film.

Me, too, unless I'm selling online which is a different animal.
Otherwise, for example a car image, I almost never crop to fit a frame. I crop the shot as it should be cropped to make the subject look it's best, & then use a mat to cover the "excess" space.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,544 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
What Aspect Ratio and Image Size to Deliver?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Stefan01
1187 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.