I eat in restaurants and their lights are always low or dim. How do I get crispy clear pictures without using a flash? Everytime I take a photo inside a low light restaurant it gets blurry or out of focus or shakes due to long exposure.
photo_wed Member 90 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:05 | #1 Permanent banI eat in restaurants and their lights are always low or dim. How do I get crispy clear pictures without using a flash? Everytime I take a photo inside a low light restaurant it gets blurry or out of focus or shakes due to long exposure. 5Dmkii / Canon 24-105L | Sigma 10-20 | 50 1.8 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:09 | #2 |
JayCeeImages Goldmember 1,544 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: CA More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:13 | #3 TheBurningCrown wrote in post #8922092 ...high ISO and a wide aperture? Yep...a steady hand will help out alot too... Nobody cares about your gear list...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CYO Member 43 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:15 | #4 mini tripod and long exposure will help
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:17 | #5 Use your 50mm 1.8 at like F2 and crank the ISO. Maybe 6400 even. Keep shutter speed above 1/80. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Oct 30, 2009 08:49 | #6 photo_wed wrote in post #8922064 I eat in restaurants and their lights are always low or dim. How do I get crispy clear pictures without using a flash? Everytime I take a photo inside a low light restaurant it gets blurry or out of focus or shakes due to long exposure. I too eat in restaurants
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Oct 30, 2009 08:57 | #7 1/(focal length x crop factor) = minimum speed you need to eliminate the camera shake without IS. For restaurants, lenses like the 17-55 f/2.8IS REALLY shine. Because I can take a shake-free shot at 1/8th of a second @ 55mm with it. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elader Goldmember 2,374 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Maryland More info | Oct 30, 2009 09:46 | #8 buy a sigma 30mm f/1.4 - its a normal length lens on your crop camera. The 50 is a little long. Wider will shake less in your hands. Also f/1.4 lets in more light and the build quality is better. You can go cheap with the 35mm f/2 from canon or expensive with the 35L f/1.4. Shoot at high ISO of course. You should be able to use ISO1600. Eric
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Oct 30, 2009 11:50 | #9 nureality wrote in post #8923699 1/(focal length x crop factor) = minimum speed you need to eliminate the camera shake without IS. For restaurants, lenses like the 17-55 f/2.8IS REALLY shine. Because I can take a shake-free shot at 1/8th of a second @ 55mm with it. I would assume restaurant shots would include people. People need like 1/60 minimum unless they are sleeping because they move, regardless of how stable the camera is. IS might be good for food shots, though. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alessandro2009 Goldmember 2,095 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Italy More info | Oct 31, 2009 02:37 | #10 I think the same as tkbslc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
toxic Goldmember 3,498 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: California More info | Oct 31, 2009 03:59 | #11 1. Higher ISO, wider aperture, and/or image stabilization
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amdisthebest Senior Member 853 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Schenectady, NY More info | Oct 31, 2009 04:03 | #12 toxic wrote in post #8928592 1. Higher ISO, wider aperture, and/or image stabilization 2. Tell everyone to quit moving Lol and +1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alessandro2009 Goldmember 2,095 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Italy More info | Oct 31, 2009 04:20 | #13 But LOL!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 02, 2009 22:18 | #14 Permanent banalessandro2009 wrote in post #8928465 I think the same as tkbslc. photo_wed you should understand the correlation between: shutter speed (and focal length) diaphragm subject ISO (exposition) what iso do you guys shoot with? normally i set it as 200-500. i'm just very worried about grainy images with 800+ iso...what ISO do u guys use? 5Dmkii / Canon 24-105L | Sigma 10-20 | 50 1.8 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bjyoder Goldmember 1,664 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Central Ohio More info | Nov 02, 2009 22:20 | #15 photo_wed wrote in post #8944424 what iso do you guys shoot with? normally i set it as 200-500. i'm just very worried about grainy images with 800+ iso...what ISO do u guys use? You can have one of two things: Long exposure (and blurry), grain free images, or shorter exposures with some digital noise. It's basically get the shot or not, so you have to decide how important that shot is to get.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1757 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||