Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 31 Oct 2009 (Saturday) 08:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

shooting portrait on monopod

 
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Oct 31, 2009 08:16 |  #1

Those of you shooting filed sports on a monopod, what do you use to quickly switch back and forth from portrait to landscape? Or, do you only shoot in landscape and then crop?

TIA




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XTi ­ Guy
Member
125 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Oct 31, 2009 11:37 |  #2

With the lens mounted to the mono (72-200 2.8 or 100-400) via the tripod collar, I leave the tripod collar screw loose so it`s a quick flip of the camera to portrait. However leaving that screw loose can cause you to get your horizons not level. You must be very aware of this. This can be corrected in post but why add the extra work.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickJushchyshyn
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Oct 31, 2009 14:59 |  #3

^^ +1


www.techvantics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willshoot4food
Member
157 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 31, 2009 15:19 as a reply to  @ NickJushchyshyn's post |  #4

...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Oct 31, 2009 16:30 |  #5

Sibil I'm assuming none of your lens have a tripod collar? The lens in mounted to the mono and spins freely to go from portrait to landscape.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kayintveen
Member
205 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2009
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
     
Nov 01, 2009 02:40 |  #6

70-200 has a ring which makes you switch really quick, i think almost all 200mm+ lenses has these!


500PX (external link) - Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link) - Twitter (external link) - other links: Magento webshop (external link) | Webshop ontwikkeling (external link) | Webdesign (external link) 1x 1D-X 1x 1D Mark III - 400mm 2.8 - 16-35 f/2.8 II - 70-200 f/2.8 is II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 01, 2009 06:44 as a reply to  @ kayintveen's post |  #7

My only lens with a collar is the Sigma 100-300/4. My Canon 70-200, 70-210, and 100-300 are without collar. I'll try the Sigma with the method you mentioned and see how it goes.

I use the Canon 100 monopod which comes with a mini ballhead. What I have been doing is manipulating the ball head to go between the two orientation which keeps the ballhead somewhat loose and kind of defeats the use of the monopod a little bit; not to mention, this methods changes the eye level enough to bug me.

For lenses without a collar, how does one go between portrait and landscape? I know the mentioned lenses are not heavy, but for low light situations, the monopod is very useful.

Thanks for the replies.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eigga
Goldmember
Avatar
2,208 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Nov 01, 2009 16:38 |  #8

Flash bracket is the only way you haven't already mentioned.

The tripod collar is worth its weight in gold.. smooth easy transition without adding more equip.

I hate the ballhead method.


-Matt
Website (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 02, 2009 05:16 |  #9

eigga wrote in post #8936135 (external link)
Flash bracket is the only way you haven't already mentioned.

Great idea. I will look into it. Thanks :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwiftFootTim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,054 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Nov 02, 2009 10:52 |  #10

I have a manfrotto monopod with a 488 RC4 on it(way overkill I found out) and thought that I would use the ballhead to go into portrait, but once I had actually used the setup and gotten some experience in photography, I found that just loosening the tripod collar on the 70-200 or 300 f/4 was the best way to do it.

I would look into tripod collars for your lenses even though they can be expensive they are worth their weight in gold IMO for shooting on a monopod. It also will help the weight distribution of your setup as a 70-200 is quite hefty in and of itself.


Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patwill
Member
108 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: USA
     
Nov 02, 2009 23:14 |  #11

Sibil, most sports shooters mount the tripod collar directly to the monopod without any head. Try that with your Sigma for a game or two and see if it works for you. If so, you might want to pick up a collar for your 70-200.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwiftFootTim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,054 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:49 |  #12

The other thing to consider is a ball head or pan/tilt head solely for the quick release plate on it if you switch between lenses at all. I have to with my 300 f/4 and then go to my 70-200 f/2.8 when it gets darker out.


Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 03, 2009 08:29 as a reply to  @ SwiftFootTim's post |  #13

Actually, I do use a quick release plate on my Canon 100 monopod. When the action is further away (and the lens being at the longer end), and I am in landscape mode, the camera stays on the monopod. When the action gets real close, where the head/legs are cut off in the frame, I quickly drop the monopod and shoot hand-held (in portrait orientation) in the 100+ mm range.

I can hand-hold just fine in the shorter end of the lens if I have enough light giving me good shutter speeds. It is when the shutter speed is marginal that I could use the monopod to curb the motion jurkiness on my end; meaning, I tend to mash the shutter a bit to hard

In addition, I am also trying to help my second shooter who has a hard time keeping the camera steady. I don't think there are lens collars available for the Canon 70-210, or the Canon 100-300, are there?

IMAGE: http://i562.photobucket.com/albums/ss67/Mirook/2ndshooter.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickJushchyshyn
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Nov 03, 2009 13:09 |  #14

There are a few options if there's no collar for your lenses.

The "Mercedes" option would be something like a Custom Brackets Studio pro kit (image below).
The cool thing about these is that the camera pivots around the lens axis.
http://www.custombrack​ets.com …Viewnew.asp?idp​roduct=153 (external link)

There's something called a Vertaflip (never used this myself):
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Heavy_Duty.htm​l#features (external link)

The least expensive option I could find is a simple tilt head that could be placed between your camera and monopod. Align your lens with the axis of the tilt so the camera can tilt sideways instead of up/down.
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Swivel_Tilt_Mo​nopod.html (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


www.techvantics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patwill
Member
108 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: USA
     
Nov 03, 2009 13:11 as a reply to  @ Sibil's post |  #15

You shouldn't be having those kinds of problems if you are using shutter speeds fast enough to freeze the action in sports, especially for daylight shooting like you show in the picture. If you are not shooting at 1/500 at the very least, you might want to try moving your ISO setting up a notch or two. For daytime, it would only be with a long telephoto, like 400 or longer, that your shutter speed wouldn't be fast enough to eliminate any blur from camera shake.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,286 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
shooting portrait on monopod
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2652 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.