Those of you shooting filed sports on a monopod, what do you use to quickly switch back and forth from portrait to landscape? Or, do you only shoot in landscape and then crop?
TIA
Sibil Cream of the Crop 10,415 posts Likes: 54444 Joined Jan 2009 Location: SoCal More info | Oct 31, 2009 08:16 | #1 Those of you shooting filed sports on a monopod, what do you use to quickly switch back and forth from portrait to landscape? Or, do you only shoot in landscape and then crop?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
XTiGuy Member 125 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Oct 31, 2009 11:37 | #2 With the lens mounted to the mono (72-200 2.8 or 100-400) via the tripod collar, I leave the tripod collar screw loose so it`s a quick flip of the camera to portrait. However leaving that screw loose can cause you to get your horizons not level. You must be very aware of this. This can be corrected in post but why add the extra work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NickJushchyshyn Senior Member 289 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Philadelphia, PA More info | Oct 31, 2009 14:59 | #3 |
willshoot4food Member 157 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2009 More info | ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dan-o Goldmember 3,539 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2006 Location: So. Cal. More info | Oct 31, 2009 16:30 | #5 Sibil I'm assuming none of your lens have a tripod collar? The lens in mounted to the mono and spins freely to go from portrait to landscape. Danny.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kayintveen Member 205 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2009 Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands More info | Nov 01, 2009 02:40 | #6 70-200 has a ring which makes you switch really quick, i think almost all 200mm+ lenses has these! 500PX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
My only lens with a collar is the Sigma 100-300/4. My Canon 70-200, 70-210, and 100-300 are without collar. I'll try the Sigma with the method you mentioned and see how it goes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eigga Goldmember 2,208 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Nov 01, 2009 16:38 | #8 |
Nov 02, 2009 05:16 | #9 eigga wrote in post #8936135 Flash bracket is the only way you haven't already mentioned. Great idea. I will look into it. Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SwiftFootTim Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Michigan More info | Nov 02, 2009 10:52 | #10 I have a manfrotto monopod with a 488 RC4 on it(way overkill I found out) and thought that I would use the ballhead to go into portrait, but once I had actually used the setup and gotten some experience in photography, I found that just loosening the tripod collar on the 70-200 or 300 f/4 was the best way to do it. Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patwill Member 108 posts Joined May 2009 Location: USA More info | Nov 02, 2009 23:14 | #11 Sibil, most sports shooters mount the tripod collar directly to the monopod without any head. Try that with your Sigma for a game or two and see if it works for you. If so, you might want to pick up a collar for your 70-200.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SwiftFootTim Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Michigan More info | Nov 03, 2009 07:49 | #12 The other thing to consider is a ball head or pan/tilt head solely for the quick release plate on it if you switch between lenses at all. I have to with my 300 f/4 and then go to my 70-200 f/2.8 when it gets darker out. Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Actually, I do use a quick release plate on my Canon 100 monopod. When the action is further away (and the lens being at the longer end), and I am in landscape mode, the camera stays on the monopod. When the action gets real close, where the head/legs are cut off in the frame, I quickly drop the monopod and shoot hand-held (in portrait orientation) in the 100+ mm range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NickJushchyshyn Senior Member 289 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Philadelphia, PA More info | Nov 03, 2009 13:09 | #14 There are a few options if there's no collar for your lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
patwill Member 108 posts Joined May 2009 Location: USA More info | You shouldn't be having those kinds of problems if you are using shutter speeds fast enough to freeze the action in sports, especially for daylight shooting like you show in the picture. If you are not shooting at 1/500 at the very least, you might want to try moving your ISO setting up a notch or two. For daytime, it would only be with a long telephoto, like 400 or longer, that your shutter speed wouldn't be fast enough to eliminate any blur from camera shake.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2652 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||