well, the lily minus the pad.
I converted using lightroom. Suggestions for improvement? I see a bit of noise... is it distracting? how about the little bee? Does he look trapped?
CoquetteRN Member 184 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2007 Location: Austin, Tx More info | Nov 01, 2009 14:29 | #1 well, the lily minus the pad. Stephanie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Nov 01, 2009 21:42 | #2 For me it's a little too close. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 01, 2009 22:15 | #3 Thanks Robert, I was in a macro shooting mode that day. Stephanie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cdeming "īt" didn't fall off 1,968 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Chicago-ish More info | Nov 01, 2009 23:09 | #4 I like it. It doesn't appear too noisy to me. I think I would like it more if the bee weren't there, but that's just me, and I understand that it may not have been possible at the time. Nice choice with B&W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawkskins Member 232 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Texas More info | Nov 02, 2009 00:02 | #5 Very nice! I like the bee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisSki Hatchling 3 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Glasgow, Scotland More info | Nov 02, 2009 06:39 | #6 The bee looks great, although it would have looked nice if the bee had been in flight, hard though. http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisbaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikepack Member 77 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Boulder, CO More info | Nov 02, 2009 23:56 | #7 I love the bee! It almost looks like it's trapped amongst the testicles of the beastly flower. However, we all know how small these are but this is a nice capture of the scale between the bee and flower. Canon Rebel XSi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RioSundoro Member 215 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Nov 03, 2009 00:58 | #8 |
Nov 03, 2009 08:04 | #9 mikepack wrote in post #8944885 I love the bee! It almost looks like it's trapped amongst the testicles of the beastly flower. However, we all know how small these are but this is a nice capture of the scale between the bee and flower. Maybe, you meant tentacles, LOL??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GorgeShooter Goldmember 1,422 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Oregon More info | Nov 03, 2009 09:34 | #10 Except for the out-of-focus foreground I like it. 1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2009 21:32 | #11 Thanks everyone! Gorgeshooter, that is a good point. I didn't really notice the out of focus foreground. Maybe I should increase my aperture a bit. I usually shoot fairly wide open because I like a narrow depth of field, but I totally agree that this image would benefit from the increased aperture. Stephanie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 883 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||