Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Nov 2009 (Tuesday) 07:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

300 f/2.8 Non IS - Sharp without but soft with both converters??? Anyone had this???

 
butcha27
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:40 |  #1

I have a 300 f/2.8 non IS. By itself it is tac sharp and great to use yet the minute i put either converter on (1.4 or 2x) every shot appears soft, I have used the 1.4 extensvely on my 300mm f/4L IS before I had this lens and it was sharp all the way through. I've even tried stopping down but to no avail.

Any ideas what could cause this? I literally have hundreds of shots that all look the same. All taken on 2 different 40D bodies, I tried my old 400D and got the same results.

I've posted example with both converters - All shots are untouched except for the 300 shot example by itself which is cropped and sharpened.

SHOT WITH 1.4X CONVERTER UNCROPPED

IMAGE: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/11.jpg

SAME SHOT 100% CROP TO SHOW BLUR (THESE CROPS WOULD BE SHARP USING THE 300 F/4L)
IMAGE: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/11100.jpg

SHOT WITH 2X CONVERTER UNCROPPED
IMAGE: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/22.jpg

100% CROP OF 2X CONVERTER
IMAGE: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/22100.jpg

300MM BY ITSELF EXAMPLE FROM THE DAY AFTER THE FIRST TWO SHOTS WERE TAKEN
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scepticswe
Member
234 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:45 |  #2

A wild guess would be that the TC adds a bit of "softening". Perhaps by simply degrading the IQ b/c the extra glass in the optical path or maybe the TC screws up the focusing? The last pic sure looks tack sharp, nothing wrong with the lens itself. Have you tried the TC on any other lens to see if those shots also get affected the same way?


EOS 500D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM, Sigma AF 70mm f/2.8 EX DG macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:48 |  #3

I have used the 1.4x extensivley on my 300mm f/4L IS, is has been great and sharp wide open too. Here's an example of it from about 3 weeks ago. Obviously I cannot use a 2x on the f/4L

IMAGE: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/NS21-012.jpg

Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdando
Goldmember
Avatar
1,039 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 22
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:54 |  #4

I noticed that I get some softness/out-of-focus when using my TC's. I had to dial in +10 and +15 micro focus adjustment to get them sharp.


Jeremy
Chimping away in MN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 07:57 |  #5

jdando wrote in post #8946161 (external link)
I noticed that I get some softness/out-of-focus when using my TC's. I had to dial in +10 and +15 micro focus adjustment to get them sharp.

I was wondering if micro adjust would help ..... unfortunately I only have 40D's for now :( but I won't forever I guess.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,164 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
     
Nov 03, 2009 08:04 |  #6

To me, it looks like a bit of front-focusing once you've got that TC on.


Col | Flickr (external link)

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 08:19 |  #7

Collin85 wrote in post #8946204 (external link)
To me, it looks like a bit of front-focusing once you've got that TC on.

I scoured through as many shots as I could looking for either front or back focussing, I think you may be right, if anythingit seem slightly to the front, I wonder if thats in thens but only increased by TC's? it seems funny it would only happen with TC's so I'm guessing it may be minescule in the lens itself.

Would micro adjust overcome it or would it be too great?


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Collin85
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,164 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sydney/Beijing
     
Nov 03, 2009 08:37 |  #8

butcha27 wrote in post #8946267 (external link)
I scoured through as many shots as I could looking for either front or back focussing, I think you may be right, if anythingit seem slightly to the front, I wonder if thats in thens but only increased by TC's? it seems funny it would only happen with TC's so I'm guessing it may be minescule in the lens itself.

Would micro adjust overcome it or would it be too great?

Not sure if MA could fix a focus discrepancy that bad, but worth a try. You should know that other glass causing AF difficulties is not uncommon. Some users even report that (quality) UV filters cause front/back focusing on some of their lenses.


Col | Flickr (external link)

Sony A7 + Leica 50 Lux ASPH, Oly E-M5 + 12/2
Canon 5D3, 16-35L, 50L, 85L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwood
Senior Member
370 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
     
Nov 03, 2009 08:55 |  #9

these are stacked converter shots ... 1DmkIII 300mm F2.8 (non IS) + 2x + 1.4x
No sharpness problems here. On the other hand I have had to micro adjust every lens I own to make sure it is focusing accurately.

IMAGE: http://christopherwood.smugmug.com/photos/667245882_Maouu-L.jpg
IMAGE: http://christopherwood.smugmug.com/photos/667245387_wToDA-L.jpg

1DxII, 5D3, 6D
BLOG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 09:06 |  #10

Nice shots, I guess the only way to try is to give it a go on someones body with the micro adjust feature and see what happens.


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdipirro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,207 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 03, 2009 11:03 |  #11

For what it's worth, my 300mm f2.8L IS is very sharp. After microadjusting with the 1.4x, the results were very little loss of IQ. However, with the 2x converter, even with microadjustment, I've never been able to get sharp results. The optimal focus is still soft. Since I've seen others not have this problem, I once asked if it's possible to get a bad copy of the 2x (or 1.4x, for that matter) or if they can be calibrated. I never got an answer to that.


Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, 16-35mm f2.8L II, 24-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L IS, 300mm f2.8L IS, 200mm f2L IS, 50mm f1.4, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L, 1.4x TC, 2x TC, 500D macro, Zeiss 21mm
Lighting: 580EX, Elinchrom 600 RX's, D-Lite 4's, ABR800, 74" Eli Octa, 100cm/70cm DOs, Photoflex Medium Octa and reflectors, PW's, Lastolite Hilite, Newton Di400CR bracket

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lippy113
Senior Member
Avatar
498 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset UK
     
Nov 03, 2009 14:07 |  #12

can you give us the exif for these images please


cwood wrote in post #8946443 (external link)
these are stacked converter shots ... 1DmkIII 300mm F2.8 (non IS) + 2x + 1.4x
No sharpness problems here. On the other hand I have had to micro adjust every lens I own to make sure it is focusing accurately.
QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
say_cheese
Senior Member
803 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Nov 03, 2009 16:43 |  #13

Canon recommends MA with and without an extender.
My 300 f4L is sharp on both my 40D and IDmk3 (without MA), if I add the 1.4 converter it is a little soft on the 40D and 1Dmk3, fortunately I have MA adjusted this set-up on my 1D and it works fine. Unfortunately the 40D does not have MA.


Tools: Canon 5DmkII, Sony a6400, Fujifilm X100V

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 17:17 |  #14

But it's not hard to determine whether it's a focusing issue though - just shoot along a fence or wall and check the sharpest section.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butcha27
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 03, 2009 22:13 |  #15

Thanks for all the input, much appreciated


Rob
www.robshots.com.au (external link)
My Gear
http://robshots.smugmu​g.com/Cricket/466317 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,415 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
300 f/2.8 Non IS - Sharp without but soft with both converters??? Anyone had this???
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1230 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.