Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 04 Nov 2009 (Wednesday) 07:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rant about NBA photography policy.

 
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Nov 04, 2009 18:47 |  #16

Croasdail wrote in post #8955827 (external link)
So you guys think they are going to start asking people to surrender their phones at the door too?

And maybe I am biased, but I haven't seen many shots from stands worth the electrons they are stored on. There are a few, but good enough for someone to sell? Really. I guess they must be selling, but that just proves some people will buy anything.

Mark I think it totally sucks but its looking like the trend. Have you seen lately how many less photographers ore on the sidelines at NFL games? Passes are not easy to get. Its even gotten harder that it was a couple of years ago. I had a to shoot something for a client during half time at a Bears game this past weekend, I had a field pass and I still had a tough time with security. Its only going to get harder and harder.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,135 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Nov 04, 2009 19:01 |  #17

I hear ya... It really is too bad. I was given some grief a couple of weeks ago by security at a NCAA game by the hired security crew... finally had to threaten calling the SID to sort it out, and they backed down. In my area, all three major venues have dramatically different rules.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Nov 04, 2009 19:32 as a reply to  @ Croasdail's post |  #18

I'm old enough to remember when they cracked down at concerts.

I had a good friend that actually started shooting concerts for local papers and one of the established older photographers started seeing him at all the concerts he was shooting and probably started seeing his work and somehow he must have known someone high up in security and my bud suddenly couldn't get in the venues even with a pass.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Nov 04, 2009 20:25 |  #19

Shoot HS sports. The players don't whine, they give 110% for the love of the game, not for the endorsements AND they will appreciate what you do for them.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racing-guy
Member
145 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Nov 05, 2009 16:32 |  #20

Not all stadiums have tight rules. I went to four Blue Jays games this year at Rogers Centre in Toronto. I checked the rules on their web site before going - no video, bags of only a certain size, photography allowed but don't interfere with the other fans' enjoyment of the game. Seemed like sensible rules to me.

No issues with security at any of the games. They were more worried about bringing in glass or alcohol. In all games I sat by first base in row 1 or 4. The ushers all saw me with my 30D and Sigma 70-200. There were other fans with DSLRs sitting near me as well.

Then again, the Blue Jays are probably just glad that anyone came to their games this year. :)


Equipment: Canon 7D & 50D, Canon 70-200 F2.8, Sigma 120-400, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mikeroscope
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: OBX, NC & Snowshoe, Wv
     
Nov 06, 2009 11:40 |  #21

I have taped a lens to my inner thigh as my friend had the body taped to his. Even after being patted down by security they are in a hurry and not trying to anger anyone so they don't go near your junk. Do the arena's your talking about have metal detectors? You could always try bribing a security guard. Those are my solutions if you are really pissed and wanna fight the system.

If they ban camera's at games then that cool effect of seeing all the flashes go off when the guy goes for a dunk would stop happening!


50D. 28-135 Kit, Nifty Fifty, 24-105 L
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MJPhotos24
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,619 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Attica, NY / Parrish, FL
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:22 |  #22

Snowshooters wrote in post #8967050 (external link)
I have taped a lens to my inner thigh as my friend had the body taped to his. Even after being patted down by security they are in a hurry and not trying to anger anyone so they don't go near your junk. Do the arena's your talking about have metal detectors? You could always try bribing a security guard. Those are my solutions if you are really pissed and wanna fight the system.

If they ban camera's at games then that cool effect of seeing all the flashes go off when the guy goes for a dunk would stop happening!

This is some of the stupidest advice I've seen on here. First try to sneak things in you're not allowed to at a major event where every security guard is on terrorist alert in his own mind. What is this from, how to get tased 101? Illegally bribe someone - good idea, risk getting someone fired and yourself banned. WHAT THE *#*(?!!?!?! Completely asinine...better advice, don't whine about it as you're supposed to be there to watch the game, not take photos.

The "cool effect" of strobes going off is the professionals on the sideline shooting and of course they would still be allowed in as they are MEDIA.


Freelance Photographer & Co-founder of Four Seam Images
Mike Janes Photography (external link) - Four Seam Images LLC (external link)
FSI is a baseball oriented photo agency and official licensee of MiLB/MLB.
@FourSeamImages (instagram/twitter)
@MikeJanesPhotography (instagram)
@MikeJanesPhotog (twitter)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:28 |  #23

And FWIW, in the NBA, not every pro is considered "Stroby Worthy" so many are still shooting ambient despite being credentialed.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thalagyrt
D'OH. I need to wake up some more.
Avatar
4,818 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Denver, CO
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:36 |  #24

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8970518 (external link)
And FWIW, in the NBA, not every pro is considered "Stroby Worthy" so many are still shooting ambient despite being credentialed.

Heh, were you referring to me? I resemble that remark. ;)

You'll see me on the floor, right side of the basket facing the court on the Heat side of the bench at most home games. D3, 70-200, long hair, usually jeans and a black button down shirt.

The NBA is very strict on photography in general when it comes to licensing, but yes, what you ran into regarding lens length is a policy of the AAA in particular. A lot of arenas have similar policies.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Apollo.11
Goldmember
Avatar
1,845 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:37 |  #25

I had the same problem at a Dallas Cowboys game. I ending bringing it in a non-camera bag. Some guy yelled at me from the sideline to put up my lens when I was shooting the pre-game warmup, so I just went to another area and started shooting again. Didn't have any issues once the game and crowd got going. I was using my 70-200.


Some Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:39 |  #26

Thalagyrt wrote in post #8970539 (external link)
Heh, were you referring to me? I resemble that remark. ;)

Persecution Complex Perhaps? :lol:

Actually, I was thinking of another friend of mine who shoots PHX Suns for a Sports Website. Fully Credentialed but not "Strobe Worthy."

I think you would agree that yours is a "unique" situation...  :p


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thalagyrt
D'OH. I need to wake up some more.
Avatar
4,818 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Denver, CO
     
Nov 06, 2009 23:41 |  #27

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8970547 (external link)
Persecution Complex Perhaps? :lol:

Actually, I was thinking of another friend of mine who shoots PHX Suns for a Sports Website. Fully Credentialed but not "Strobe Worthy."

I think you would agree that yours is a "unique" situation...  :p

Haha, yep. The strobes are pretty much sacred ground in NBA arenas though. They're owned by the NBA, there are generally 5 sets, so only 5 people can use them. They cannot be used for any non-NBA events, period, unless approved by the NBA. It's nuts how protective they are of them.

In the AAA the people who get them: Heat Photographer (not game, just random stuff), NBA Photographer (my buddy that I shoot with), Sun Sentinel, 2x Miami Herald




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 07, 2009 06:05 as a reply to  @ Thalagyrt's post |  #28

Just curious, what's the ambient light in an NBA arena? ISO, SS, app.?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,135 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Nov 07, 2009 07:20 |  #29

Sibil wrote in post #8971317 (external link)
Just curious, what's the ambient light in an NBA arena? ISO, SS, app.?

They are all very good, seldom needing more than iso 800. They used to have it so you could shoot slightly pushed 400, and it has only gotten better. But they are all a little different, so there is no one setting. I would typically go 1/800 min SS, f2.8-3.2 on the long lens, and f4 on my wides. The wides you can stop down more because they gather more reflected light than a tele....and of course aren't as shutter speed critical.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thalagyrt
D'OH. I need to wake up some more.
Avatar
4,818 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Denver, CO
     
Nov 07, 2009 12:45 |  #30

ISO 6400, f/3.5, 1/1000" is my typical exposure to get things spot on without having to adjust in post. Our arena seems to have turned their lights down a bit.

Example:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,907 views & 0 likes for this thread, 31 members have posted to it.
Rant about NBA photography policy.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2728 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.