Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Nov 2009 (Thursday) 12:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

high ISO NR, Canon RAW vs Lightroom

 
ssabripo
Member
Avatar
116 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: 26° 8′ 8.75″ N, 80° 8′ 30.52″ W
     
Nov 05, 2009 12:30 |  #1

have a question, I'm still playing with the 7D that I got a few days ago, and wanted to know what do you guys recommend for Noise Reduction on High ISO pics?

I took some pics in low lighting at 6400 and 12800 iso, and there was considerable noise (red dots everywhere, etc). I use Lightroom for the most part, but a few folks have told me that the new Canon RAW software that comes with the 7D has a better NR feature.

any insights would be appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 05, 2009 13:36 |  #2

Preferences vary between people -- install DPP and try it out for yourself! Also, programs like Noise Ninja offer LR-compatible functions.

The one downside about any such things is that you end up with something other than a Raw file to deal with, assuming you want to continue to manage things in LR. That's what keeps me doing pretty much everything in LR except for special projects.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Nov 05, 2009 16:46 |  #3

The jury is still out on this one and likely to remain out for several months. That is because Lightroom 3 is now in public beta but the new, and they claim better, N.R. is still incomplete. What is operative looks promising, however. So I'd say that at the present time DPP is better than LR 2 but that might change.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 06, 2009 04:19 |  #4

Sharpening (and NR) in LR (external link).

I'd leave the luminance NR slider in LR alone, unless you *really* need it. Also; be careful with the chroma NR slider.

Play with the "detail" and "masking" slider for sharpening first, so you don't sharpen the noise.

DPP's NR is different. Chroma NR works okay, and leaves more detail then LR sometimes, but it also leaves "white speckles" (which you can easily get rid of in Photoshop if you have that)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Nov 06, 2009 07:08 |  #5

Play with the "detail" and "masking" slider for sharpening first, so you don't sharpen the noise.

René,
It doesn't matter when you move the sliders, the order in which sharpening and n.r. are applied is entirely determined by the (unalterable) internal workflow.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Nov 06, 2009 07:19 |  #6

Hahahaha. I know. I meant "first" as: "try what you can do with those, because it is better not to have to use NR at all".

Also, getting the detail and masking right first, may cause you to use a lower NR setting later. :mrgreen:


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 147
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Nov 06, 2009 13:09 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #7

Try this program called neat image. Its pretty good.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,224 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Nov 07, 2009 04:33 |  #8

Use Canon DPP. You can go nuts with the chroma noise reduction, crank it all the way if needed. The images will have a pleasing look usually. Be careful with the luminance noise slider as increasing it kills detail.

For images where the highest quality is needed process without NR in DPP and then use custom made neat image profiles.


amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,922 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
high ISO NR, Canon RAW vs Lightroom
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1378 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.