Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 06 Nov 2009 (Friday) 14:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ef-s on ef mount?

 
footballdude2k3
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: North Liberty, Iowa
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:06 |  #1

If all that is really different is that the back sticks out a bit more, would you be able to use say kenko extention tubes an have a 17-55 work on a 5d2?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
footballdude2k3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: North Liberty, Iowa
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:09 |  #2

if you are able to do this, would you lose a stop?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,729 posts
Likes: 4064
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:11 |  #3

You would loose some light depending on the tube used. You would also loos the ability to focus at distance again depending on the tube used. Why do you want to do this?


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
footballdude2k3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: North Liberty, Iowa
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:12 |  #4

oh i dont want to do this, my mind is usually 8 places at once, so it was just a random thought, if i were to think about doing this i would prolly sell a 17-55 and pick up a 24-70.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,729 posts
Likes: 4064
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:14 |  #5

footballdude2k3 wrote in post #8968034 (external link)
oh i dont want to do this, my mind is usually 8 places at once, so it was just a random thought, if i were to think about doing this i would prolly sell a 17-55 and pick up a 24-70.

That would be best. The 24-70 on a full frame is about as perfect as the 17-55 on a crop.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thegrandpoohbah
Senior Member
Avatar
327 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
     
Nov 06, 2009 14:14 |  #6

It would probably work for macro shots but you lose the ability to focus to infinity so the lens won't really "work".


Canon EOS 6D | Canon Powershot S95 w/ WP-DC38 | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM | Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4X | Canon Extender EF 2X III | Canon Speedlite 580EX II | Sigma EF 530 DG Super | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XsiBrian
Member
64 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: California
     
Nov 06, 2009 15:15 as a reply to  @ thegrandpoohbah's post |  #7

I tried this when I first got my Kenko Tubes (for fun) and while it works with a 12mm tube >~35mm, the shorter focal lengths can only focus inside the lens (Negative working distance). At 55mm the infinity focus is around 6-8" and if I recall correctly the corners were very much black. There is little real use for this setup beyond curiosity.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
footballdude2k3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: North Liberty, Iowa
     
Nov 06, 2009 15:37 |  #8

XsiBrian wrote in post #8968380 (external link)
I tried this when I first got my Kenko Tubes (for fun) and while it works with a 12mm tube >~35mm, the shorter focal lengths can only focus inside the lens (Negative working distance). At 55mm the infinity focus is around 6-8" and if I recall correctly the corners were very much black. There is little real use for this setup beyond curiosity.

sounds good, thank you sir.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,935 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2477
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Nov 06, 2009 16:11 |  #9

I've played with 60efs on a tube mounted on a 1DMKIII and works well as a macro lens with focus range from about 3" in front of the lens at 1:1 to 13" at 00. With the Canon 12 tube you keep AF.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 06, 2009 19:16 |  #10

footballdude2k3 wrote in post #8967999 (external link)
If all that is really different is that the back sticks out a bit more, would you be able to use say kenko extention tubes an have a 17-55 work on a 5d2?


the difference isn't just the mount...there's also the smaller image circle...so there will be a lot of vignetting...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Nov 07, 2009 06:59 |  #11

DreDaze wrote in post #8969524 (external link)
the difference isn't just the mount...there's also the smaller image circle...so there will be a lot of vignetting...

Not forgetting that as the lens is moved away from the sensor (by the tube) then the image circle will become larger....exactly why extension tubes result in greater magnification.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,198 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
ef-s on ef mount?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
679 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.