Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 07 Nov 2009 (Saturday) 20:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Advice please!

 
priscillajoyphotography
Member
35 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 07, 2009 20:02 |  #1

Hey everyone,

I'm just starting out in photography...I just graduated from hs. What do you think of my latest photography session: http://priscillajoypho​tography.blogspot.com …ssion-jack-butler_05.html (external link).

Any help/advice/tips would be greatly appreciated!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 07, 2009 20:12 |  #2

You have a good start. I guess the one thing that jumps out to me is that the skin tones on the subject are quite hot. There is little detail there and the face is nearly blown out. Are you using a calibtrated monitor?


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 07, 2009 22:22 |  #3

nice looking shots, but I also notice that the highlights are blown. Spyder monitor calibrator is your friend.

Some of the colors are very vibrant/saturated, just be careful not to go overboard with post processing. You might want to actually get some prints done and compare to how they look on the screen to get a better idea of what they look like.


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
priscillajoyphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 09, 2009 14:33 |  #4

Ok, thanks for the tips. But what is spyder monitor calibrator? I am just staring out with the free trial of lightroom 3....i am hoping to get adobe photoshop 4 by the end of the year. this was pretty much one of my first times ever editing photos with this kind of processing....i know i need lots of work in that area!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2009 14:40 |  #5

priscillajoyphotograph​y wrote in post #8984425 (external link)
Ok, thanks for the tips. But what is spyder monitor calibrator? I am just staring out with the free trial of lightroom 3....i am hoping to get adobe photoshop 4 by the end of the year. this was pretty much one of my first times ever editing photos with this kind of processing....i know i need lots of work in that area!

Spyder 3 Express (external link)

It's a device that goes over your screen (plugs into computer with USB cable) and the software displays various shades of colors which the device reads and then it makes your screen look the way it should. If you get one don't be surprised if your screen is darker then what you are used to, and alot warmer looking. :)

I have Spyder2 which I bought used for $40 or something, works great.


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
priscillajoyphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 09, 2009 14:43 as a reply to  @ DStanic's post |  #6

i see. $40 doesn't sound bad. one question tho, is it something that is recommended for photographers...?? do most of them own this?

and do you have any advice about adobe photoshop? i am trying to decide between that or lightroom 3.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2009 14:50 |  #7

I would hope that most pro photographers would have their monitors calibrated! Spyder is probably the most popular brand there are a few other ones that are good too.

I think alot of wedding photographers will mainly use Lightroom 80% of the time because it can do all the important things that need to be done with a very quick workflow. Some pics they might open up in CS4 or whatever to do more manipulation with them. For basic photo editing, I love Lightroom!

check out this website http://www.lightroomki​llertips.com/ (external link)


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
priscillajoyphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 09, 2009 14:55 |  #8

Ok, thanks for letting me know. I didn't even know that existed. I will look into getting one. Right now I'm doing famalies, Seniors, kids, etc....hopefully eventually will do weddings once I have more experience. So is Lightroom best to start off with and then advance to Photoshop?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2009 15:01 |  #9

priscillajoyphotograph​y wrote in post #8984596 (external link)
So is Lightroom best to start off with and then advance to Photoshop?


I would say "yes" but everybody is different. Judging by your current photos, you aren't doing any heavy manipulation to them or making them very "artsy", so LR should be able to do what you need it to do. If you are working with RAW files, LR is especially good.

Check out this link to see the differences
http://www.adobe.com/p​roducts/photoshop/fami​ly/ (external link)

CS4 is a very, very powerful image editing/graphic design program.

Another good option to have along with Lighroom is Photoshop Elements.. still a very good program with a much lower cost then CS4.


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
priscillajoyphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 09, 2009 15:07 |  #10

I'd really prefer not to make too many changes to the photos....because I'd like them to be as original as possible. But still good looking images.
This photographer: http://jamiedelaineblo​g.com …-Shannon-and-Darcy.....my (external link) goal is eventually get these kind of photos....I know it is a long way away....but her photos are stunning.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2009 15:35 |  #11

priscillajoyphotograph​y wrote in post #8984687 (external link)
I'd really prefer not to make too many changes to the photos....because I'd like them to be as original as possible. But still good looking images.
This photographer: http://jamiedelaineblo​g.com …-Shannon-and-Darcy.....my (external link) goal is eventually get these kind of photos....I know it is a long way away....but her photos are stunning.

Very nice photos indeed. Kinda similar to my wedding photographer (and sort of a mentor) Jeff Toogood .http://toogoodstudios.​ca/ (external link)

He mostly uses LR, CS4 when needed.


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 09, 2009 16:36 |  #12

I use Lightroom because I do very little artsy or pixel level editing, and when I do need to go in for more editing than LR can handle I use Elements. Spending full boat for Photoshop which I almost never use makes no sense to me.

The point to monitor calibration is because a monitor is a changeable device. You can turn the brightness up or down for instance. Calibrating a monitor means that prints made will match the appearance on screen.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Nov 09, 2009 16:39 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

I would say that is a good start as well, but the person needs to be more natural than straight looking at the camera




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 09, 2009 16:44 |  #14

JeffreyG wrote in post #8985244 (external link)
Calibrating a monitor means that prints made will match the appearance on screen.

After I shot my first wedding I spend many hours editing the pics and I thought they looked great. But after getting them printed- and worse- seeing them on the couple's computer screen all washed out looking.. It was an easy decision to hunt down a used Spyder2express!!


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frugal
Senior Member
Avatar
784 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Northern CA
     
Nov 09, 2009 18:36 as a reply to  @ DStanic's post |  #15

Right after you've taken a shot, there's a button on camera that will show you if you have blown out highlights due to overexposure. Take a look in your camera manual at the various display modes. There's one that will show you over-exposed areas. Also read up on histograms. Then your pics will only need small adjustments to look beautiful on your calibrated monitor. If your budget is limited, take a look at the Huey Pro calibrator for about $90 new. I use one and the prints I get back from my lab match my monitor very closely.


Richard
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,128 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Advice please!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2978 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.