Went out today with my 70-200 L, and saw this little guy at a feeder. I'm very new at the digital photagraphy world, any CC would be welcome.
cfurlo Member 239 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Nov 08, 2009 19:23 | #1 Went out today with my 70-200 L, and saw this little guy at a feeder. I'm very new at the digital photagraphy world, any CC would be welcome. Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FSRobT Member 53 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Nov 08, 2009 20:24 | #2 Are you using the IS version or not? Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I went back and looked, the focus was square on its head. It might have been my poor editting skills. I don't know if the exif is intact, but it was shot at iso 100, 200mm IS, Tv 1/500, Av 2.8, out of a 10D. maybe should of went to Av 4.0? Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FSRobT Member 53 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Nov 08, 2009 21:59 | #4 At the bottom you should see an edit button next to "quote" etc Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jgrussell Looking around nervously 18,758 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: NJ USA More info | Nov 08, 2009 22:07 | #5 Welcome to POTN. Yes, using a larger aperture would have given you more depth of field (more would have been in focus). At f2.8, only a very small part of the shot will be in focus. -- jgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2009 22:19 | #6 FSRobT wrote in post #8980370 At the bottom you should see an edit button next to "quote" etc I probably would have stopped down to 4 or so.. probably would have helped bring more bird. LOL, the problem was the size of the file. Any suggestions for maintaing quality with the decreases size? Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2009 22:21 | #7 jgrussell wrote in post #8980415 Welcome to POTN. Yes, using a larger aperture would have given you more depth of field (more would have been in focus). At f2.8, only a very small part of the shot will be in focus. I guess I was so excited to have the 2.8 that I just shot everything with it, LOL. I also forgot to change the WB and was shooting AWB. Canon 10D/ 50D/ 70-200 f/2.8 L IS/ 28-135 IS/ 50 f/1.8, Tokina 11-16 2.8, 430 EX II, 580 EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2936 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||