40d
70-200f4L
580exII
cybersyncs
christisdale Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 08, 2009 21:07 | #1 |
jbergdoll Goldmember 1,176 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Tempe, AZ More info | Nov 08, 2009 21:19 | #2 Permanent banComp is wack, can't see the landing. If you had him framed in the upper left area and you could see the bank he's rolling down, the lurkers wouldn't be nearly as distracting and it would be much better composed. Also, get the watermark outta here. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christisdale THREAD STARTER Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 08, 2009 21:38 | #3 jbergdoll wrote in post #8980139 Comp is wack, can't see the landing. If you had him framed in the upper left area and you could see the bank he's rolling down, the lurkers wouldn't be nearly as distracting and it would be much better composed. Also, get the watermark outta here. will repost after more pp ChristianTisdale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christisdale THREAD STARTER Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 08, 2009 21:39 | #4 i also wanted the sky in there too though thats why he isnt in the area you suggested ChristianTisdale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Nov 09, 2009 00:04 | #5 The crop is kinda strange to me, seems like you were trying to cut out more clutter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trt-reece Senior Member 265 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Wollongong, Australia More info | Nov 09, 2009 00:07 | #6 jbergdoll wrote in post #8980139 Also, get the watermark outta here. What's wrong with watermarking? www.reecemcmillan.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jbergdoll Goldmember 1,176 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Tempe, AZ More info | Nov 09, 2009 01:55 | #7 Permanent banchristisdale wrote in post #8980268 i also wanted the sky in there too though thats why he isnt in the area you suggested Ok, all I'm saying is your composition is really off. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffCanon Senior Member More info | Nov 09, 2009 12:59 | #8 trt-reece wrote in post #8981001 What's wrong with watermarking? Nothing IMO Critiques Welcomed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
focus.pocus Goldmember 3,423 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Geneva Switzerland / South Carolina U.S.A. More info | Nov 09, 2009 13:06 | #9 trt-reece wrote in post #8981001 What's wrong with watermarking? first of all it's cheap looking... I know, right? I'm just sayin'...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christisdale THREAD STARTER Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 09, 2009 17:51 | #10 How does it look cheap? Do you mean watermarks in general or just that one? ChristianTisdale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christisdale THREAD STARTER Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 09, 2009 18:32 | #11 |
rideuntildeath Member 119 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Victoria BC More info | Nov 09, 2009 18:53 | #12 for this image i agree the watermark doesnt really have a place to go ; would look funny up top and down below is the landing, dont exactly want to put it there 7D | Canon 70-200 2.8 IS I | Canon 24-70 2.8 L | Canon 10-22 | 50mm 1.8 | 430 EX II | 1 Vivitar 285 HV | Elinchrom Skyports
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christisdale THREAD STARTER Member 199 posts Likes: 11 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Kamloops BC Canada More info | Nov 09, 2009 19:09 | #13 rideuntildeath wrote in post #8986178 for this image i agree the watermark doesnt really have a place to go ; would look funny up top and down below is the landing, dont exactly want to put it there I think the second image is cropped a bit better but i just dont feel the image in general ; kids in the background are still distracting whoa someone from close to home! thanks for the comment ChristianTisdale.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jbergdoll Goldmember 1,176 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Tempe, AZ More info | Nov 09, 2009 23:16 | #14 Permanent banrideuntildeath wrote in post #8986178 for this image i agree the watermark doesnt really have a place to go ; would look funny up top and down below is the landing, dont exactly want to put it there I think the second image is cropped a bit better but i just dont feel the image in general ; kids in the background are still distracting That's what I was going for. -Joseph
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2668 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||