Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 09 Nov 2009 (Monday) 10:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Transcend CF cards - any good?

 
Roy ­ Mathers
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2009 10:29 |  #1

Does anyone have any experience with Transcend CF cards? They seem to be much cheaper than equivalents from Sandisk, Lexar etc, so I was wondering whether they were worth it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 09, 2009 10:30 |  #2

I have a couple. I've had zero problems with them over the course of a year using them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2009 10:34 |  #3

Thanks a lot gonzogolf - I think that's what I suspected and wanted to hear!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emilysium
Member
242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 09, 2009 12:50 |  #4

I have the 8gb 133x. It's worked well for my purposes. On Amazon, someone posted read and write speeds for Transcend and Sandisk. I would take a look:

http://www.amazon.com …ref=cm_ciu_pdp_​images_all (external link)


40D | 20D converted IR | 17-40L | 24-70L | 70-200L 2.8 IS | 50 1.4 | 580EX II | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Nov 09, 2009 12:53 |  #5

i have the 4GB and 8GB 133 and 266 cards, zero problems over 2 years of use.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yendikeno
Senior Member
Avatar
359 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 98
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Nov 09, 2009 12:55 as a reply to  @ -MasterChief-'s post |  #6

Same here - have three Transcend CF cards that have been used for a couple of years now with no problems.


_____________
Regards,
AZFred

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:01 |  #7

Thanks for all the input. I read the amazon comparison but I think the Transcend would be plenty fast enough for normal use - agreed?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:04 |  #8

Card writing speed is important to people who do lots of bursts of shooting, or who have older cameras with small buffers. For general use I wouldnt double the cost of my card to increase the speed. A possible exception might be for the new generation of cameras with quicker write speeds, it might be nice to take advantage of that capability but still not critical to what I do.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:11 |  #9

I think that's my view. I have a 40D, so I think the write speed of the Transcend will be ample.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amarinelli
Senior Member
Avatar
450 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Apr 2009
Location: United States
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:13 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #10

The only card I ever had fail on me was an 8 GB Transcend card that will do it for me with the transcends
Alan


www.Marinelliphotograp​hy.com (external link) www.facebook.com/marin​elliphotography (external link)
Canon 5D Mark IV|x2|Canon5D Mark III | Canon RP|Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS MK II | Tamron 24-70 vc| canon RF 70-200 2.8| Canon RF 15-35 2.8| Canon 24 -105 L| |Canon 70-200f/4 is L||Sigma 150-600 C| Kenko 1.4 Extender| 600 EX-RT x2|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:14 |  #11

You're in the minority so far Alan!:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amarinelli
Senior Member
Avatar
450 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Apr 2009
Location: United States
     
Nov 09, 2009 17:17 |  #12

Roy Mathers wrote in post #8985531 (external link)
You're in the minority so far Alan!:D

I know unfortunately after I lost 41 wedding shots. I have several transcend cards and that is the first failure of any card Sandisk and Dane electric included

Alan


www.Marinelliphotograp​hy.com (external link) www.facebook.com/marin​elliphotography (external link)
Canon 5D Mark IV|x2|Canon5D Mark III | Canon RP|Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS MK II | Tamron 24-70 vc| canon RF 70-200 2.8| Canon RF 15-35 2.8| Canon 24 -105 L| |Canon 70-200f/4 is L||Sigma 150-600 C| Kenko 1.4 Extender| 600 EX-RT x2|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
P51Mstg
Goldmember
Avatar
1,336 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Mt. Carmel, TN
     
Nov 09, 2009 18:13 as a reply to  @ Amarinelli's post |  #13

Been using TRANSCEND 266c 8GB CF cards and 16GB SDHC cards for several years.... No problems. Shoot lots of cards. They are the best, especially considering the price...... (which is low)

Mark H


Too Much Camera Stuff......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik_L
Goldmember
3,160 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 09, 2009 23:48 |  #14

I have a transcend 16 GB SDHC class 6 card and it is MUCH slower than my SanDisc 16 GB SDHC Class 4 card. using the SanDisc, I almost never see the "busy" when managing the images in camera, with the Transcend, I see it often.

I would spend the extra money if possible.


Canon EOS 1D III
Manfrotto 190X Pro B w/324RC2 "Action Head" | Canon 580EX II
Sigma 20 f/1.8 | Canon 35 f/1.4 L | Sigma 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 85 f/1.4 | Canon 135 f/2 L
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Nov 10, 2009 04:49 |  #15

Thanks Erik.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,266 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Transcend CF cards - any good?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1604 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.