Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 10 Nov 2009 (Tuesday) 00:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

macbookpro 15 question?

 
romeo26
Member
159 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Nov 10, 2009 00:23 |  #1

iam planning on getting a mbp 15 and cant decide on what should i upgrade: should i get 8gb of ram or upgrade the processor to 3.06ghz?

iam going to use this for video editing, and school. i also qualify for the education discount!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Nov 10, 2009 00:32 |  #2

You will see much more of an improvement by increasing the RAM.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damian75
Goldmember
Avatar
1,623 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2006
Location: PA
     
Nov 10, 2009 01:09 |  #3

+1^^^^ plus budget a large FW800 external if you are doing video.


Canon EOS 40D,30D, Canon 70-200 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 85 1.8, Canon extension tube, Elinchrom Lighting gear, 
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Nov 10, 2009 01:31 |  #4

Even better might be a 17" which would give you the option of ExpressCard slot. With this you can use e-sata drives, which are even faster than fw 800.

I recently got an ExpressCard E-sata card, and and dual slot e-sata drive dock - both for about $65. I can now connect two sata drives together, used as a RAID, or as separate drives. Mondo fast transfers on my 17 Unibody.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damian75
Goldmember
Avatar
1,623 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2006
Location: PA
     
Nov 10, 2009 01:41 |  #5

I have an eSata card in my 15mbp was sad when they got rid of it on the new 15's


Canon EOS 40D,30D, Canon 70-200 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 85 1.8, Canon extension tube, Elinchrom Lighting gear, 
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxxuM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,361 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 22
Joined May 2007
Location: Rio Grande Valley
     
Nov 10, 2009 09:40 |  #6

romeo26 wrote in post #8987980 (external link)
iam planning on getting a mbp 15 and cant decide on what should i upgrade: should i get 8gb of ram or upgrade the processor to 3.06ghz?

iam going to use this for video editing, and school. i also qualify for the education discount!

As an IT professional, I would go with the bigger CPU for the simple fact that you won't be able to upgrade it in the future, whereas you will with RAM. Second, there isn't much of a speed difference between 4GB and 8GB of memory. And third, memory prices tend to drop over time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Nov 10, 2009 09:57 |  #7

Yes, apple glues their cpus into the board, so you won't be able to change that out any time. RAM can always be upgraded.

Now, if you don't already have a mac/mac software, there are other options where you can order cake and eat it too


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Nov 10, 2009 15:41 |  #8

Normally, I'd agree that getting the fastest chip you can get, is prudent with laptops.

However, the difference between 2.8 and 3ghz is just not enough to notice. Seriously, you'd be better off spending your money on maxing out the RAM which you will definitely notice, especially if you're going to be use (multiple) Adobe products.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaxxuM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,361 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 22
Joined May 2007
Location: Rio Grande Valley
     
Nov 10, 2009 16:00 |  #9

It really all depends on the person's computer habits. For me, running Aperture, Photoshop CS4 (5 images in the 200-500MB range), Mail, iCal, Remote Desktop Connection and Firefox at the same time still leaves me 1.5GB free from 4GB.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,192 posts
Gallery: 109 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area
     
Nov 10, 2009 16:44 |  #10

RAM


multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
Leicas, Canons, Hasselblads
all and historic dingus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Nov 10, 2009 16:45 |  #11

I'm with Maxxum on this one, even my 2gb laptop (which is pushing it) could do LR2 (10k catalog) and photoshop (five layer 10mp tiff) without bogging down (and with outlook, 30 tab firefox, and some random pdf open, and most of all, Vista 32bit). 4gb is the sweet spot right now, in about 2-4 years, 8gb will.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,192 posts
Gallery: 109 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area
     
Nov 10, 2009 17:59 |  #12

I'm with Maxxum on this one, even my 2gb laptop (which is pushing it) could do LR2 (10k catalog) and photoshop (five layer 10mp tiff) without bogging down (and with outlook, 30 tab firefox, and some random pdf open, and most of all, Vista 32bit). 4gb is the sweet spot right now, in about 2-4 years, 8gb will.

There's always the point of diminishing return. With CPUs, as someone wrote, the dif of 2.8 vs 3.0 ghz isn't much, but costs lots more. 4 GB of laptop RAM is a great bang for the buck. 8 GB is better if you can afford it, still a better investment than 0.2 GHz


multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
Leicas, Canons, Hasselblads
all and historic dingus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Nov 10, 2009 18:09 |  #13

mcluckie wrote in post #8992519 (external link)
There's always the point of diminishing return. With CPUs, as someone wrote, the dif of 2.8 vs 3.0 ghz isn't much, but costs lots more. 4 GB of laptop RAM is a great bang for the buck. 8 GB is better if you can afford it, still a better investment than 0.2 GHz

I think the point is: if you are going to spend money now, spend it on the CPU. If not, just wait a bit and then upgrade ram. Saves OP money, and since I doubt OP already does photo/video at the level OP will in a year or two, then why spend the money now when it won't help now, and it'll be cheaper when it will help?


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,585 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
macbookpro 15 question?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
768 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.