Ok great! Thank so much for all your help!! 
Ok great! Thank so much for all your help!! Court.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoePhotoOnline Senior Member  915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Central Valley, California More info | For under a $1000, the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 is a very fast lens. I use it for night-time football with good results. Should work great for moto-x as long as you are not super far away like up in the grand stands or something.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle"  10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Nov 11, 2009 15:45 | #18 If you have a limited budget, I'd too recommend the 50-250IS and keeping the XT body. If you can spring for it, a 70-200mm f2.8 lens from Canon/Sigma/Tamron maybe even a better option, but it's much more expensive. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember  4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Nov 11, 2009 15:47 | #19 I also recommend getting the 55-250IS and keeping the XT. I've had my XT for several years now, and I guarantee you it can produce some fantastic shots if you stick with it. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2812 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
