Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 11 Nov 2009 (Wednesday) 14:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

grandma and her grandkids - C&C please

 
dipps
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 11, 2009 14:53 |  #1

ok, first off, i'm no pro photog (this wasn't a paid shoot, was just doing it for my family) and i can take criticism fairly well, so lay it on me.

i'm just starting to dabble in raw images, DPP, Adobe Camera RAW, Photoshop Elements 6, and i've been reading up in various books and other threads here on this forum to try and learn how to do things correctly.

i took the image with my 85mm f/1.8, and while it was earlier in the afternoon, took precautions to stay out of direct sunlight. images taken using tripod and remote trigger, f/8 aperture, 1/125sec.

i'm relatively happy with the pic, and the family is very happy with the pics straight out of the camera even, but i'm trying to do this as best and can and use it as a learning oppurtunity.

white balance was set in DPP, using the eyedropper to pic various "bright spots" on the image until i was happy with the results (i've since gotten a gray card). i've adjusted saturation levels, background saturation, sharpness somewhat, highlights, etc. most work was done in DPP, not much done in PSE6 at this point in time (again, still a work in progress).

my monitor is a cheap samsung 22", tuned with pantone huey. i'd like to get a dell 2209WA eventually, but haven't yet. when i view the pic, the black in the darker areas of the pants doesn't look quite right.... looks a bit blotchy/noisy. everything else looks fine, so i'm wondering if that's an issue with my cheap samsung monitor.

any other thoughts, feedback, criticisms? again, i'm looking to learn how to do this better, so any tips/tricks/links to sites that will help me learn how to do this better, i'd appreciate. thanks.

http://img402.imagesha​ck.us/img402/1817/gmak​ids.jpg (external link)


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Nov 11, 2009 15:01 |  #2

looked at the pic. You went to a lot of thought and did some good things. However, the first thing I noticed is gram doesn't have a body!!! EEEEKKKK! I can't imagine a bigger 'no-no' than producing a pic that looks like the girls are balancing g'ma's HEAD between them!

Maybe you could have brought out a chair, sat gram there and positioned the lovely grandkids around her?

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Nov 11, 2009 15:12 as a reply to  @ snyderman's post |  #3

I agree ^ Even just sitting on the ground would have done the trick.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dipps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 11, 2009 15:55 |  #4

However, the first thing I noticed is gram doesn't have a body!!! EEEEKKKK! I can't imagine a bigger 'no-no' than producing a pic that looks like the girls are balancing g'ma's HEAD between them!

ok, fair enough. in my defense, that was just a candid shot that we did while waiting for my "always late" aunt to show up, lol. the actual point of the "shoot" was to get a group family pic, which i did, but while i was waiting, i offered to take pics of anyone who wanted their pic taken, and with whomever.... hadn't planned on doing that, so no chair. mom wanted a pic with the kids, so i just let her pose however she wanted. only other pics i have of her with the kids (and standing up) is this one.....

http://img691.imagesha​ck.us/img691/7876/img5​408h.jpg (external link)

mind you, the above is straight out of the camera. no PP done on it yet, no sprucing up the background colors, no white balance fixing, etc. so i did get at least ONE shot with grandma standing up (not including the group shot and the one with her two sons, me and her dorky other son).

lol


does the black in the dark area of the pants look normal to you (in the original pic)? is the "blotchiness" i see just an issue with my monitor?


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dipps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 11, 2009 17:09 |  #5

ok, here's a quick update of the 2nd pic i posted, with everyone standing.......

smaller image file
http://img511.imagesha​ck.us/img511/3633/gggm​akids.jpg (external link)

if i'm on the right track, cool, let me know. if not, steer me a little please. :)


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimlock
Goldmember
Avatar
2,912 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron
     
Nov 11, 2009 17:45 |  #6

Yup. I agree fully on the first one. Grammies head balancing on their shoulders just doesn't look right.

The 2nd shot is much better. You do some skin smoothing?
In any case, I like the feel of the shot overall.


- Jerry | Zenfolio (external link)

| 5DMarkII | 15FE | 35L | 85L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dipps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 11, 2009 18:41 |  #7

Grimlock wrote in post #8998629 (external link)
You do some skin smoothing?

i was messing around with adobe camera raw (using PSE 6), and was working in the detail tab..... in the "noise reduction" area, the "luminance" slider was set to 0, so i zoomed in to 100% (on their faces) and started messing with the luminance slider in noise reduction.... wound up at 88 instead of the original zero setting.... the further i moved it, the smoother the colors in their faces became. dunno of that was the correct way to do things or not, but i liked the outcome. lol


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skrim17
The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity.
Avatar
40,070 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: In my tree
     
Nov 11, 2009 18:44 |  #8

I like the second shot but also think the first would work if it is sharp enough to withstand a serious crop. I would crop the second as well.


Crissa
PLEASE HELP ME FIND MY PHOTOS!! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dipps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 11, 2009 20:18 |  #9

Skrim17 wrote in post #8998964 (external link)
I like the second shot but also think the first would work if it is sharp enough to withstand a serious crop. I would crop the second as well.

crop the 2nd also, eh? dunno.... i personally kind of like how that one is framed up, with a bit of additional fall foliage up top for added color, so i may try cropping that one later, but for now i tried cropping the original pic a bit more, as well as some other quick adjustments (more color, luminance NR, etc)......

http://img694.imagesha​ck.us/img694/6605/gmak​idsv2.jpg (external link)


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimage
Senior Member
Avatar
278 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 4
Joined May 2009
Location: I am a moving target.
     
Nov 12, 2009 06:21 |  #10

dipps wrote in post #8998423 (external link)
ok, here's a quick update of the 2nd pic i posted, with everyone standing.......

smaller image file
http://img511.imagesha​ck.us/img511/3633/gggm​akids.jpg (external link)

if i'm on the right track, cool, let me know. if not, steer me a little please. :)

The very first image you posted was a bit abstract regarding the composition... I agree with the others there. But I really liked this edit of the second image. Great job!


Kriszta

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dipps
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
538 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
     
Nov 12, 2009 07:03 |  #11

thanks, i actually did wind up doing a closer crop of the 2nd one (of a saved tiff version), and i agree it probably looks a bit better. i doubt i'm doing everything the "proper way" or using all the correct techniques yet, but working at it.

the biggest thing i'm trying to understand yet is what i should be doing in adobe camera raw, versus what i should be doing in PS elements. so far in adobe camera raw, i:
- try to obtain a proper adjustment on white balance
- further temperature adjustment after WB fix, if necessary
- possible slight exposure adjustment
- "recovery" adjustment for background details
- possible "fill light" adjustment
- some "vibrancy" adjustment for additional background colors

rarely touch "blacks"
rarely touch "contrast"
rarely (if ever) touch "saturation"

on details tab, in noise reduction area
adjust "luminance" dramatically less "color noise", give smoother skin features

and that's about all i do in adobe camera raw. oftentimes i'll save a dng at this point. i then open in PS elements, do minor image rotation if necessary to straighten out the subject, crop with either a 4x6 or 8x10 framing restriction, then save as a tiff file, then safe as a jpeg file. if i want to resize the image to make it smaller, i usually use bicubic sharper resampling. so far i don't do much else in elements. i imagine there's plenty more for me to learn there.


5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,599 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
grandma and her grandkids - C&C please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is vinceisvisual
1201 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.