MickeyCT wrote in post #8999481
I'm ready to add to my gear and increase my skills but can't decide if I should get the 17-55/f2.8 or a flash, either 430 or 580. I'm just a hobbyist and would like to take better candids of friends and family. What do you think? Can I get good candids indoors with that lens without a flash? Or should I get a flash first and add the lens later?
Tough choice, especially not knowing what lens you have now. The 17-55 is an excellent lens and I would expect sharpness and focus speed to improve over whatever lens you are looking to replace. It stays sharp even at f/2.8 and the IS makes it easy to hand hold at lower shutter speeds.
Whether or not f/2.8 will provide enough shutter speed for your candids depends on how much light you have and how much your people are moving. Somewhat still in a room full of windows would be much better than fast moving in candle light.
This is ISO 800, f/2.8, 1/20
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
If you choose the flash, it is worth it to get the 580 over the 430. I have both and much prefer the 580 because of the control dial on the back and because the head swivels all the way around in both directions.
Flash can greatly improve your pictures. It has a focus assist, it helps to freeze motion, and the light can be bounced or aimed from different directions to help you get just the look you want. The 580 isn't small, and it does change the feel and handling of the camera.
The good thing about the flash is you can put your camera in manual mode and pick your shutter speed and aperture. Put the flash in ETTL, flip the head around so it points over your shoulder, and let it do all the work. It is hard not to get a good picture.
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |