I have been reading the white paper on the mark4 and came to this section
i quote
Now why can that algoritham not be put into the mk3 as a firmware update ??
MK4 white paper = http://www.usa.canon.com …-1D%20Mark%20IV%20WP1.pdf![]()
PeteW Goldmember More info | Nov 12, 2009 09:39 | #1 I have been reading the white paper on the mark4 and came to this section To go along with the hardware and manufacturing process improvements, Canon also completely revamped the firmware used to calculate predictive focus. As a result, a significantly improved AI Servo AF algorithm now called AI Servo II AF eliminates focusing errors, maintains tracking and improves response. In the past, Canon AF system development concentrated on achieving fast response. Highly responsive AF systems offer accurate predictive AF (they focus quickly on subjects in the AF frame), but they have difficulty stabilizing focus if the subject leaves the AF frame during AI Servo AF continuous shooting. The 1D Mark III, highly responsive by design, consequently has a lower probability of accurately focusing on fast-moving subjects that are hard to keep within the AF frame. With the new 1D Mark IV AI Servo II AF algorithm, stability, reliability and AF precision have all been improved without a sacrifice in responsiveness. Predictive AF is more intelligent and avoids over-response, and difficult lighting — both low contrast and very bright conditions — is handled better. Canon has conducted numerous field tests with professional photographers both in the US and abroad and the resulting feedback has helped to make the algorithm precisely suited to the shooting needs of pro users. Now why can that algoritham not be put into the mk3 as a firmware update ?? All the best
LOG IN TO REPLY |
epatt250 Senior Member 769 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Central, Arkansas More info | Nov 12, 2009 10:06 | #2 Well assuming they could.. they wouldn't b/c it would hurt MkIV sales. Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 12, 2009 10:10 | #3 Yes, if they could, they still won't. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Nov 12, 2009 10:11 | #4 Pete W wrote in post #9001937 Now why can that algoritham not be put into the mk3 as a firmware update ?? Because software is always limited by the hardware it is running on. That's my best guess. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shiro69 Member 54 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Nov 12, 2009 10:19 | #5 I think if they can they will. as firm ware updates keep coming out why woudn't they? they want the cameras old or new to work the best they can or it comes back on them
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2009 10:28 | #6 Can you guys in the USA question Mr Chuck Westfall as I will not get a reply from Canon UK, but Canon USA are by far the most receptive... Would be interesting to see his take on it... All the best
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Nov 12, 2009 12:07 | #7 How do we know that they have not? This is just marketing you know.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FLPHOTO Senior Member 315 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Florida More info | Nov 12, 2009 12:44 | #8 Interesting question. I too would like to see what Mr. Westfall has to say. To that end I will submit a question to him. If he receives enough of them from us he will likely answer personally or in his monthly tech tips column. --- www.davidpugsleyphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 12, 2009 12:54 | #9 shiro69 wrote in post #9002143 I think if they can they will. as firm ware updates keep coming out why woudn't they? they want the cameras old or new to work the best they can or it comes back on them Because Canon very, very seldom issues firmware updates to add functionality to old cameras, firmware is usually there to address issues. Don't buy 3 year old technology expecting Canon to continually upgrade its features through firmware, it isn't going to happen. Old cameras do not break because new models are introduced, and the MKIII works fine as is. Why is this expectation out there? I can understand hoping they would, but to almost basically "demand it" is just silly. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FLPHOTO Senior Member 315 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Florida More info | Nov 12, 2009 12:55 | #10 Here is your answer: --- www.davidpugsleyphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 12, 2009 12:58 | #11 FL PHOTO wrote in post #9002978 Here is your answer: In a word, no. The AI Servo II algorithm was developed exclusively for the 1D Mark IV's newly designed AF sensor, so it would not be compatible with the 1D Mark III camera. Best Regards, Chuck Westfall Advisor, Technical Information CIG Professional Prods Mktg Division And even if it would work with the MKIII processor and AF sensor, the answer would have still been a resounding no. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Nov 12, 2009 14:22 | #12 I just love seeing Canon say in print why it is that so many people had trouble with the MkIII AF for certain subjects/uses.... GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | Nov 12, 2009 15:09 | #13 FL PHOTO wrote in post #9002978 The AI Servo II algorithm was developed exclusively for the 1D Mark IV's newly designed AF sensor... Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 12, 2009 15:10 | #14 apersson850 wrote in post #9003642 Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm. Maybe they have some configurable settings in the software and during the firmware build, they denote which platform it is for, 7D or MKIV, and the final result is then exclusive for that body. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Nov 12, 2009 15:11 | #15 apersson850 wrote in post #9003642 Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm. Exclusively for the AF sensor, not for the camera itself. If the 7D and 1Dmk4 are using the same physical sensor (or at least sensors from the same family/generation) then it is still a true statement. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1598 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||