Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2009 (Thursday) 09:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can the 1D mk3 be given the mk4 AI servo algoritham

 
Pete ­ W
Goldmember
Avatar
1,328 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 705
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Hilgay, Norfolk. UK
     
Nov 12, 2009 09:39 |  #1

I have been reading the white paper on the mark4 and came to this section
i quote

To go along with the hardware and manufacturing process improvements, Canon also completely revamped the firmware used to calculate predictive focus. As a result, a significantly improved AI Servo AF algorithm now called AI Servo II AF eliminates focusing errors, maintains tracking and improves response. In the past, Canon AF system development concentrated on achieving fast response. Highly responsive AF systems offer accurate predictive AF (they focus quickly on subjects in the AF frame), but they have difficulty stabilizing focus if the subject leaves the AF frame during AI Servo AF continuous shooting. The 1D Mark III, highly responsive by design, consequently has a lower probability of accurately focusing on fast-moving subjects that are hard to keep within the AF frame. With the new 1D Mark IV AI Servo II AF algorithm, stability, reliability and AF precision have all been improved without a sacrifice in responsiveness. Predictive AF is more intelligent and avoids over-response, and difficult lighting — both low contrast and very bright conditions — is handled better. Canon has conducted numerous field tests with professional photographers both in the US and abroad and the resulting feedback has helped to make the algorithm precisely suited to the shooting needs of pro users.

Now why can that algoritham not be put into the mk3 as a firmware update ??


MK4 white paper = http://www.usa.canon.c​om …-1D%20Mark%20IV%20WP1.p​df (external link)


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS QGP ASINWP
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epatt250
Senior Member
769 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Central, Arkansas
     
Nov 12, 2009 10:06 |  #2

Well assuming they could.. they wouldn't b/c it would hurt MkIV sales.


Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
www.elipattersonphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 12, 2009 10:10 |  #3

Yes, if they could, they still won't.

It would like a car manufacturer that three years later found out how to create a better fuel and ignition map on their newest offerings that share the same exact motor and similar computer as the one 3 years prior. They would not offer all consumers that ability to take their 3 year old vehicles to the shops to reflash the computer, they expect you to buy the new vehicle.

In this case, the Canons' don't even share the same processor, but that probably wouldn't matter with their revised algorithms, both could probably run them.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Nov 12, 2009 10:11 |  #4

Pete W wrote in post #9001937 (external link)
Now why can that algoritham not be put into the mk3 as a firmware update ??

Because software is always limited by the hardware it is running on. That's my best guess.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shiro69
Member
54 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Nov 12, 2009 10:19 |  #5

I think if they can they will. as firm ware updates keep coming out why woudn't they? they want the cameras old or new to work the best they can or it comes back on them




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ W
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,328 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 705
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Hilgay, Norfolk. UK
     
Nov 12, 2009 10:28 |  #6

Can you guys in the USA question Mr Chuck Westfall as I will not get a reply from Canon UK, but Canon USA are by far the most receptive... Would be interesting to see his take on it...


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS QGP ASINWP
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Nov 12, 2009 12:07 |  #7

How do we know that they have not? This is just marketing you know.

AI servo II double cheese with fried onions super algorithm!

They may have included a similar update in one of the Mark III updates. Who cares it works fine.
There is nothing wrong with the 1DIII now. Canon is just throwing it under the bus to gain trust.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FL ­ PHOTO
Senior Member
315 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Florida
     
Nov 12, 2009 12:44 |  #8

Interesting question. I too would like to see what Mr. Westfall has to say. To that end I will submit a question to him. If he receives enough of them from us he will likely answer personally or in his monthly tech tips column.


--- www.davidpugsleyphoto.​com (external link) ---
1D MkIII -- 17-40 f/4L
-- 24-105 f/4L -- 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L -- 500 f/4L -- 1.4x -- 580 EXII -- Better Beamer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 12, 2009 12:54 |  #9

shiro69 wrote in post #9002143 (external link)
I think if they can they will. as firm ware updates keep coming out why woudn't they? they want the cameras old or new to work the best they can or it comes back on them

Because Canon very, very seldom issues firmware updates to add functionality to old cameras, firmware is usually there to address issues. Don't buy 3 year old technology expecting Canon to continually upgrade its features through firmware, it isn't going to happen. Old cameras do not break because new models are introduced, and the MKIII works fine as is. Why is this expectation out there? I can understand hoping they would, but to almost basically "demand it" is just silly.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FL ­ PHOTO
Senior Member
315 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Florida
     
Nov 12, 2009 12:55 |  #10

Here is your answer:

In a word, no.

The AI Servo II algorithm was developed exclusively for the 1D Mark IV's newly designed AF sensor, so it would not be compatible with the 1D Mark III camera.

Best Regards,

Chuck Westfall
Advisor, Technical Information
CIG Professional Prods Mktg Division


--- www.davidpugsleyphoto.​com (external link) ---
1D MkIII -- 17-40 f/4L
-- 24-105 f/4L -- 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L -- 500 f/4L -- 1.4x -- 580 EXII -- Better Beamer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 12, 2009 12:58 |  #11

FL PHOTO wrote in post #9002978 (external link)
Here is your answer:

In a word, no.

The AI Servo II algorithm was developed exclusively for the 1D Mark IV's newly designed AF sensor, so it would not be compatible with the 1D Mark III camera.

Best Regards,

Chuck Westfall
Advisor, Technical Information
CIG Professional Prods Mktg Division

And even if it would work with the MKIII processor and AF sensor, the answer would have still been a resounding no.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 12, 2009 14:22 |  #12

I just love seeing Canon say in print why it is that so many people had trouble with the MkIII AF for certain subjects/uses....

It further reinforces my feelings that the Mark II still trumps the MkIII for AF in certain circumstances.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Nov 12, 2009 15:09 |  #13

FL PHOTO wrote in post #9002978 (external link)
The AI Servo II algorithm was developed exclusively for the 1D Mark IV's newly designed AF sensor...

Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 12, 2009 15:10 |  #14

apersson850 wrote in post #9003642 (external link)
Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm.

Maybe they have some configurable settings in the software and during the firmware build, they denote which platform it is for, 7D or MKIV, and the final result is then exclusive for that body. :)

Basically like when I create messaging software and I introduce a configurable message delay. Pay me more, the delay goes down, pay me less the delay goes up! Funny I actually have this, but we don't leverage it for revenue, but rather to emulate slow internet traffic to see if we can reproduce client issues. We joke about it though here!


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Nov 12, 2009 15:11 |  #15

apersson850 wrote in post #9003642 (external link)
Exclusively is to take it a bit far, since the 7D has the same algorithm.

Exclusively for the AF sensor, not for the camera itself. If the 7D and 1Dmk4 are using the same physical sensor (or at least sensors from the same family/generation) then it is still a true statement.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,010 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Can the 1D mk3 be given the mk4 AI servo algoritham
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1598 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.