Hi Guys,
I am very new to photography and using Xs with 50mm 1.8 for this shot. Let me know what u ppl think.
Thanks
Killeramit Member 74 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 More info | Nov 12, 2009 17:43 | #1 Hi Guys, Canon 6D, Canon 50 mm 1.4, Canon 85 mm 1.8, Canon 70-200 2.8 L, Canon 40 mm 2.8, Canon Speedlite 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LivingDaylight Senior Member 387 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Nov 12, 2009 20:17 | #2 I like the processing, but I would try to take him off center a little to add interest. Also, his face seems to be a little out of focus (could just be compression). Canon XS; Tamron 17-50 IS; Sigma 55-200; Nifty Fifty; 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PixelPusher Goldmember 1,929 posts Gallery: 85 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1205 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Surf City, USA - Left Coast More info | Nov 12, 2009 22:13 | #3 Great subject and nice expression. Would love to see this a little closer up with those wonderful expressive eyes and better focus on the eyes too next time. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Is it just me, or does everything look yellow? you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottKCooper Goldmember 1,500 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Central, VA More info | Nov 13, 2009 07:15 | #5 the background is distracting - the expression is great! https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1276863
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Nov 13, 2009 08:34 | #6 Is it just me, or does everything look yellow? To me, too. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DragonDan Senior Member 316 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Nov 13, 2009 15:49 | #7 I like that you got down to his level. +1 on keeping with the rule of thirds Canon EOS 50D gripped; Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8; ∑30mm f/1.4; ∑105mm macro; 70-200mm f/4L; 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
griptape Goldmember 2,037 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Home More info | Nov 13, 2009 17:55 | #8 No offense meant here, but your "watermark" absolutely screams "I suck at photoshop". If you're going to put a watermark on your pictures, it needs some serious reworking. It's very distracting. The picture itself is well framed, but looks pretty soft, and the bokeh is ugly (which is the nature of the 50mm 1.8 )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CassidyBrendan Member 69 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Nov 13, 2009 20:55 | #9 For the watermark, I believe the solution to remove the white box is to change your watermark layer to Multiply. BrendanCassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
griptape Goldmember 2,037 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Home More info | Nov 14, 2009 01:17 | #10 CassidyBrendan wrote in post #9011399 For the watermark, I believe the solution to remove the white box is to change your watermark layer to Multiply. The easiest way to do a watermark is actually to create a new brush. That way you can change the size and color/opacity at will, and there will be no border. If you're using photoshop, you make your watermark on a transparent background (most colors would actually work, but just to make it easier on yourself...) and then click Edit>Define Brush Preset.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2009 11:22 | #11 griptape wrote in post #9010547 No offense meant here, but your "watermark" absolutely screams "I suck at photoshop". If you're going to put a watermark on your pictures, it needs some serious reworking. It's very distracting. The picture itself is well framed, but looks pretty soft, and the bokeh is ugly (which is the nature of the 50mm 1.8 ) I know i suck at photoshop coz i am too cheap to pay for it. i just made this in MS word. lol ill try to do a better job next time. Canon 6D, Canon 50 mm 1.4, Canon 85 mm 1.8, Canon 70-200 2.8 L, Canon 40 mm 2.8, Canon Speedlite 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2009 11:23 | #12 CassidyBrendan wrote in post #9011399 For the watermark, I believe the solution to remove the white box is to change your watermark layer to Multiply. Thanks i will try that tonight Canon 6D, Canon 50 mm 1.4, Canon 85 mm 1.8, Canon 70-200 2.8 L, Canon 40 mm 2.8, Canon Speedlite 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 17, 2009 11:24 | #13 ScottCooper wrote in post #9007169 the background is distracting - the expression is great! Yeah i know that fence is very distracting. Canon 6D, Canon 50 mm 1.4, Canon 85 mm 1.8, Canon 70-200 2.8 L, Canon 40 mm 2.8, Canon Speedlite 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | I wouldn't worry about the watermark just yet, learn how to take a great photo, then watermark it you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1344 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||