I'm going to Japan on vacation in January for a few weeks. I will attend the sumo basho in Tokyo but will also have a rail pass and will be going to Kogoshima (far away from Tokyo in southern Kyushu). I plan to take four lenses with me.
For the indoor sumo event I plan to take my 70-200Lf/2.8-IS plus my 24L-II. I'm not sure if I should also take my 16-35L. I will probably also pack my 1.4x just in case I need more reach. During the matches and ceremonies I plan to probably shoot the 70-200 exclusively and use the 24 just for some wide shots of the entire building. I will probably also use the 24 as my walking around lens getting to and from the venue.
I think I will use my 16-35L indoors and my 24-105L outdoors. I find the 24-105 to be extremely versatile.
Out of all four, (16-35, 70-200, 24-105, 24) which one would you leave home if you were me? I'm shooting FF. The 70-200 is an absolute requirement for the sumo matches and the 24 is mandatory for urban city shots, especially at night. I'm thinking of leaving the 16-35 home and get by with just the 24 for wide angle and low light and night shots. The 24-105 doesn't work well at night in my experience.

