I'll get real excited about this product when I see some real world testing and reviews.
Indeed. Pocketwizards TTL products had such horrible range issues at release that you could hardly make the case that they delivered the product they promised. And the Radiopopper PX system took longer to come to market then the Chevy Volt.
I can't imagine these products failing if they (the Chinese manufacturers) already have remote trigger down pat. Reverse engineering and understanding the e-TTL algorithms doesn't take a whole lot especially after YongNuo has already released a TTL Nikon flash and has told me that their Canon version is on the way. There is no doubt in my mind that the Chinese manufacturers involved in producing knock offs of popular triggers, though branded differently, do share wiring diagrams and even molds. If there was ever a price for the not-so-secret recipes, I'm sure it's dirt cheap over there.
Now, I'm not surprised this came out. I knew this would eventually follow after radio frequency transmitters/receivers came out... but literally less than a week after I got my RF-602s?! ****!
Chinese manufacturers don't share crap with each other. Most likely, this type of stuff comes out of a single factory with multiple agents calling on customers. They won't share tools, because the profit margins are ridiculous. Tooling for a set of triggers probably ran the "brand" selling these pieces $30 - $40 grand US, but required about $200 in supplies and $1000 in labor.
They will, however, steal from each other. At our principal factory, thumb drives and laptops are not allowed in engineering -- not that it means much. If someone wants your cad drawings, your board layouts, whatever -- they'll get it. And that's alot cheaper than reverse engineering.



