Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
Thread started 18 Nov 2009 (Wednesday) 22:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can we add a 'Fine Art' or 'artistic' or 'surreal' keyword to

 
mikekelley
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 18, 2009 22:58 |  #1

The B&W, Still Life and Experimental forum?

I think there are a few posters who do more than the normal type of basic photography and who venture into the conceptual area of things. I don't want to say that a lot of people don't "get it" it's just that it seems there is not a lot of feedback in the way of this stuff because it doesn't really fit into one of the categories that we have up there, per se. Which I guess is cool about photography...it's so multi facted.

We could use a little place to get together and I think this would be a good place to add it on, rather than begging for a new 'fine art' forum or something.

It seems like there is a lot of discussion on the HOW of photography here, but not the why. Or am I just on the wrong boards? Don't get me wrong I love the whole gear aspect of photography, I just wish there was more of a designated place for fine art photography or conceptual stuff where the fact that there is motion blur or out of focus spots on purpose is a part of the photo.

There's a surreal photos thread in there which is really cool but I don't think many people see it because they don't really think much of that forum other than 'oh, thats where people go to post 800 of the same water drop shots'


Does this make ANY sense to any one?

Or we could just you know, bump that forum up to the top so it gets more traffic :lol:


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Nov 19, 2009 08:55 |  #2

I think the term "fine art" is subjective and as indicated by debates all over the net, can include anything from urban to landscape photography.

But I will certainly second the motion to add: artistic, surreal, and abstract. Good idea.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 19, 2009 16:45 |  #3

Anyone else? I don't see this hurting any or adding clutter, just helping to categorize more


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,396 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2526
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Nov 19, 2009 17:12 |  #4

mikekelley wrote in post #9041339 (external link)
It seems like there is a lot of discussion on the HOW of photography here, but not the why.

I agree, and that is why we added all those talk forums a while ago in https://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=110

I endorse all attempts to bring up philosophical, historical, artistic and metaphysics-related discussions. I've seen those gradually emerge, but as we know digital cameras are very technical things and it's so easy to forget the emotional and visual impact produced by an image is not done with pixel quality and low noise but with content, vision and style. I don't think adding Fine Art to forum name does it, though. It's a slow ongoing process and the topics will change when cameras as so good that they do not need all the attention in shooting process :)

Also, fine art photographers traditionally have used medium format (even film! :)) , and they are not so community-oriented as DSLR users.

I'll put your suggestion into the wall, and keep it in mind in the future, thanks!

Or we could just you know, bump that forum up to the top so it gets more traffic :lol:

You never know what future brings :)


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 19, 2009 17:37 |  #5

Thanks for the response Pekka. However, I think that those "talk about photography" forums are really just another place to discuss the 'how did you get that shot? or how do you shoot a wedding?"

Etc etc.

I agree with you on most other points.


But do you think we could add surreal images to that forum's title :)

There is a huge thread in there with all surreal images and most people dont think to post them there because it's not in the description.


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,118 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Can we add a 'Fine Art' or 'artistic' or 'surreal' keyword to
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1540 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.