I shot these two photos and can't decide if looking a the camera or looking away from the camera is better. Would love to hear your feedback the good the bad and the ugly.
Thanks
1.
2.
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Nov 19, 2009 04:19 | #1 I shot these two photos and can't decide if looking a the camera or looking away from the camera is better. Would love to hear your feedback the good the bad and the ugly. 2. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
longsight Senior Member 662 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: North Lakeland UK. More info | 1 for me also. Martin Sanderson Photography.com or
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Nov 19, 2009 07:31 | #4 #2. Because #1 has their heads turned way too much for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hannya Goldmember 1,062 posts Likes: 66 Joined Apr 2008 Location: UK More info | Nov 19, 2009 07:36 | #5 Hi. I almost think you might have moved yourself so that you could have taken shot 2 as they were looking at you. I think the lighting is more balanced in that shot. “Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckfishel2001 Goldmember 2,297 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cincinnati More info | Nov 19, 2009 07:44 | #6 Hannya wrote in post #9042741 Hi. I almost think you might have moved yourself so that you could have taken shot 2 as they were looking at you. I think the lighting is more balanced in that shot. Yeah, I'd agree that the lighting is slightly more balanced in the second, but I actually like the first better. I like seeing the eyes more. Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2009 07:52 | #7 |
snyderman Cream of the Crop 7,084 posts Likes: 8 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Wadsworth, Ohio More info | Nov 19, 2009 08:02 | #8 both are good. #2 for better lighting, #1 for better eyes. Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | i think 2 looks better because of lighting. #1 is the better shot and would have worked had the main been moved to about the 7-8 oclock position. i think the main was not positioned right in #1. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhatPhoto Senior Member 307 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Chicago, Il. More info | I think that #2 is better, it is more natural. The first one is very blah, like almost made to smile. Alden Photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2009 16:16 | #11 Thank you all for your great comments it looks like we have a consensus number 1 because of eye contact and number two for lighting. Thanks for the nput I will probably reshoot this with some of the suggestions here and will repost it later. This has been very helpful. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slicer Senior Member 748 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2009 Location: PA More info | Nov 19, 2009 16:24 | #12 Slaterza wrote in post #9045860 Thank you all for your great comments it looks like we have a consensus number 1 because of eye contact and number two for lighting. Thanks for the nput I will probably reshoot this with some of the suggestions here and will repost it later. This has been very helpful. just a tip...try not to put the eyes on the same plane Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2009 00:55 | #13 Thanks for all the great responses. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
korrektor Goldmember 4,908 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Moscow, Russia More info | Nov 20, 2009 01:13 | #14 1 is great and funny at the same tine for some reason WEBSITE http://mikhaylovphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StanJonesPhotography Senior Member 616 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Omaha, Nebraska More info | Nov 20, 2009 13:57 | #15 1 is good, but the shadows kill it, Your local, young, friendly, heavily-tattooed wedding/senior/portrait photographer... if you're from Lincoln, NE.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1605 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||