Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Nov 2009 (Thursday) 09:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is this noise pattern normal? (5D II)

 
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Nov 19, 2009 20:18 |  #31

yep it's 'normal'...Still a great camera!


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Turning
Senior Member
720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Renton
     
Nov 19, 2009 21:56 as a reply to  @ Mr. Clean's post |  #32

Yes, typical. I can see under certain conditions at iso 100 without bumping brightness. Seems to be dependent on colors, with dark orangish redish dark brown shadows being the most sensitive.

My 5d doesn't do it, I've compared back to back. The pattern, that is.

I have a fantasy that the firmware update will somehow ameliorate the pattern. Who says I'm not an optimist....

Once a person sees it, it becomes much more noticeable. Best not to ever look close, maybe. That way one can more easily ridicule those that see it and are not pleased with the patterns.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Panopeeper
Senior Member
774 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Nov 19, 2009 22:41 |  #33

Turning wrote in post #9047678 (external link)
I can see under certain conditions at iso 100 without bumping brightness

The intensity will be increased even if you don't do that explicitely. For example if you are using LR/ACR, then a +0.4 EV "exposure" adjustment is applied without displaying that on the slider. Brightness=+50 is exactly as much as Exposure=+1, except in the highlights. Saturation too changes the intensity of the color channels.

Seems to be dependent on colors, with dark orangish redish dark brown shadows being the most sensitive

The pattern noise is identical in the three raw channels, depending only on the pixel intensity. However, depending on the illumination and on the color of the subject, an area may be low on one or more channels, even if it is not very dark all together.

For example a nice blue sky is low on red, thus it can become noisy - caused exclusively by the red channel. Incandescent light is low on blue, thus the blue channel is more often the source of noise.

See http://www.cryptobola.​com/PhotoBola/SourceOf​Noise.htm (external link)

That way one can more easily ridicule those that see it and are not pleased with the patterns.

LOL, that's a great idea.


Gabor

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 19, 2009 23:03 |  #34

IMAGE: http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p910695919-4.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Turning
Senior Member
720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Renton
     
Nov 19, 2009 23:04 |  #35

Panopeeper wrote in post #9047911 (external link)
The intensity will be increased even if you don't do that explicitely. For example if you are using LR/ACR, then a +0.4 EV "exposure" adjustment is applied without displaying that on the slider. Brightness=+50 is exactly as much as Exposure=+1, except in the highlights. Saturation too changes the intensity of the color channels.

The pattern noise is identical in the three raw channels, depending only on the pixel intensity. However, depending on the illumination and on the color of the subject, an area may be low on one or more channels, even if it is not very dark all together.

For example a nice blue sky is low on red, thus it can become noisy - caused exclusively by the red channel. Incandescent light is low on blue, thus the blue channel is more often the source of noise.

See http://www.cryptobola.​com/PhotoBola/SourceOf​Noise.htm (external link)

LOL, that's a great idea.

All good points. Thanks.

I guess with me I dream about Canon helping it with the next firmware because in most other respects the camera's IQ is so great. The extra detail over my 5d even at f/16 is great (and the primary reason I bought the 5d2.) Once I trust my 5d2 more completely I will probably sell my 5d just because I no longer use it.

And I'm serious, I've deliberately stopped peeping for the noise pattern and I'm a little happier pretending it doesn't exist.

I still peep comparing lenses and focus, though......




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Turning
Senior Member
720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Renton
     
Nov 19, 2009 23:05 |  #36

nicksan wrote in post #9048003 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

See, I can see the pattern the most in the reddish area....Told you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jorl
Senior Member
Avatar
594 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
     
Nov 19, 2009 23:39 |  #37

unfortunately its about norm for this camera.


FOR SALE: Brand new Nikon 50mm 1.4G - Msg me for details
FOR SALE: Used MB-D10 Battery Grip - Msg me for details
FOR SALE: CANON 24-70 f2.8L Lens http://www.flickr.com/​photos/synthet...76299​57367627/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thatkatmat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,342 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold
     
Nov 20, 2009 12:26 |  #38

Nice:D , your's looks to be a little more subtle than mine Nick

nicksan wrote in post #9048003 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE


My Flickr (external link)
Stuff
"Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut." -Jimmy Conway
a9, 12-24/4G, 24-70/2.8GM, 100-400GM, 25/2 Batis, 55/1.8ZA, 85 /1.8FE, 85LmkII, 135L...a6300,10-18/4, 16-50PZ, 18-105PZ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,238 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
Is this noise pattern normal? (5D II)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1548 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.