Which lens are you tired of hearing about?

So I have been looking through the forums for the past week and seeing the same lenses poping up again and again. I was wondering if there is anyone else that is tired of seeing the same lenses poping up? (ya i know this is a lens forum and Q's are repeatedly posted.)
So if you are tired of a seeing a lens being posted about which lens is it?

-BB

None, really. If I see a thread title that does not interest me, I won't click through. Scanning over a list of titles isn't too tiresome.

tokina 11-16mm 2.8...

great it's a good lens and all...but all the UWA's out there aren't really bad...and honestly...who the hell needs the 2.8 for that lens

thanks i think i needed that...also awaiting the inevitable back lash..

EF-S 17-55.

I get a bit weary seeing the same questions about particular lenses or types of lenses or lens features:

24-70 vs 24-105

Which 70-200?

What's a good UWA for my Rebel/40D/50D?

What's the best lens for _______________ (fill in the lens with your choice of subjects: i.e. "Portraits", "Sports", "Weddings", "Macro")?

Should I upgrade from my kit lens?

Do I need IS?

My personal favorite... Which protective filter should I permanently install on my oh-so-precious new lens?

None really. Just interesting to see the different opinions on lenses.

1200mm .... and of course i have to bring it back up on the search page

I haven't gotten sick of reading about any lenses yet. I'm always interested in people's opinions on lenses. Word of mouth is the best advertisement to me. Most of my questions get answered just reading other people's threads.

I say it's gotta be the nifty fifty. Really good lens for the buck but I'm sick of hearing about it..

mrkgoo wrote in post #9052959
EF-S 17-55.

^^^^^

Not that I've ever used it, but still... feels like every single lens thread I read somehow has to do with the 17-55.

DreDaze wrote in post #9052923
tokina 11-16mm 2.8...

great it's a good lens and all...but all the UWA's out there aren't really bad...and honestly...who the hell needs the 2.8 for that lens

thanks i think i needed that...also awaiting the inevitable back lash..

IMHO the Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is the best UWA lens for a cropper.
EVERYONE ALWAYS need the fastest lens no matter what focal range I prefer a larger aperture to IS and/or more reach (especially for a UWA, generally you buy the lens more for the 10mm than the 22mm, right ?).

I haven't been sick of hearing about any lens. Personal experience is more important to me than a review. That's why I got on this forum in the first place.
No offense but this thread doesn't make sense to me. If someone has to ask about the 50 F1.8, then go on, that's why we're here!

I want to see MORE posts on the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L I.S. lens, incl pics both OF, and FROM the lens, with and without teleconverters.

I'm also tired of opening a thread, ESP in the Lens Sample Photo Archive, and seeing MORE "comments" than there are PHOTOS. Don't get me wrong, it's nice to see and read feedback of the posted photos, but it would be nice to actually SEE MORE PHOTOS.

I like reading everyone opinions on different lens, the wat I see it if you don't like it don't read it!

amfoto1 wrote in post #9052960
My personal favorite... Which protective filter should I permanently install on my oh-so-precious new lens?

hahaha! That was actually the reason why I joined this forum and also my very first thread
but thanks to you guys I have decided against buying a filter for my oh-so-precious new lens

harleybrewer wrote in post #9053259
I like reading everyone opinions on different lens, the wat I see it if you don't like it don't read it!

If you read my ENTIRE post, I said it's NICE to see and read people's opinions about a lens, it would just be NICE to see MORE PHOTOS taken from said lens!

You don't have to be a smart ass about it. I KNOW if I don't LIKE it, I don't have to READ it!!