Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 21 Nov 2009 (Saturday) 16:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding lens?

 
TweakMDS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Nov 22, 2009 08:39 |  #16

Coming from an amateur with limited gear: I'd probably go for 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 IS (on 2 FF bodies), but as said above, if you have to ask this question here, you should really doubt whether or not you should shoot weddings (on a pro-level - as a primary shooter).
Situations can change and you might have to change strategies very quickly, like switch to a low light prime or pick something wider than 24mm, etc.
Not everything comes out best with natural light only, so having the proper flash technique down can help out.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 22, 2009 09:22 |  #17

cdifoto wrote in post #9060851 (external link)
I didn't get the impression that OP was asking for advice/recommendations​. It came across to me as another pointless theoretical/what if/survey thread.

And looking back, you may be correct. If so, I will take 20 lashes with a wet noodle.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 22, 2009 09:58 |  #18

Then again it could be solicitation of advice disguised as a survey. :D


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vibin247
Member
Avatar
163 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: So. CA
     
Nov 29, 2009 23:45 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #19

On a FF: 24-70L & 70-200 f/4 L IS
On a 1.3X: 16-35L II & 70-200 f/4L IS
On a 1.6X: 17-55 & 70-200 f/4L IS


Gear List
Manual, manual, manual...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Nov 30, 2009 15:04 |  #20

vibin247 wrote in post #9105639 (external link)
On a 1.6X: 17-55 & 70-200 f/4L IS

Crap. Here's more silly talk of a 70-200 on a 1.6x crop.

Listen up... It's too freaking long for a wedding!

And don't make me lie to my wife and buy one just to prove it because I will!!!

IS f/2.8

<drool>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 30, 2009 16:40 |  #21

RT McAllister wrote in post #9109385 (external link)
Crap. Here's more silly talk of a 70-200 on a 1.6x crop.

Listen up... It's too freaking long for a wedding!

And don't make me lie to my wife and buy one just to prove it because I will!!!

Damn, does that mean I have to stop using mine? 'cause I use it at every wedding, about a hundred of them so far.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsw910
Goldmember
Avatar
2,650 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Nyc
     
Nov 30, 2009 16:48 |  #22

tim wrote in post #9110008 (external link)
Damn, does that mean I have to stop using mine? 'cause I use it at every wedding, about a hundred of them so far.

not if you're in a 20x20 room :p but then again, those tears will be HUGE ! :lol:


Scuba Tom
http://tomwangphotogra​phy.com (external link)NYC Wedding Photographer (external link)http://www.tomwangphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 30, 2009 16:48 |  #23

What format, Tim?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 30, 2009 17:14 |  #24

tsw910 wrote in post #9110041 (external link)
not if you're in a 20x20 room :p but then again, those tears will be HUGE ! :lol:

I'm sure Tim has other lenses as well.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 30, 2009 17:19 |  #25

tsw910 wrote in post #9110041 (external link)
not if you're in a 20x20 room :p but then again, those tears will be HUGE ! :lol:

Depends, the rest of the world uses meters, 20x20m would definitely call for a 70-200 :p

jr_senator wrote in post #9110045 (external link)
What format, Tim?

jr_senator wrote in post #9110159 (external link)
I'm sure Tim has other lenses as well.

1.6X crop, 7D and 40D. I have lenses from 10mm to 200mm.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Nov 30, 2009 17:24 |  #26

tim wrote in post #9110008 (external link)
Damn, does that mean I have to stop using mine?

Yes. Throw that useless piece o' crap door stop away before you gets a hernia. :cry:

cause I use it at every wedding, about a hundred of them so far.

Well, If I did weddings in 40 acre parks while sitting in a barcalounger drinking Iced-T...

Seriously... STOP!!! Delete this stupid-assed thread now! The 70-200 sucks and I don't need one. I'd rather be standing on the altar... in plain view... right between the couple... with my 10mm doing justice to the groom's ear hair.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joelene
Senior Member
930 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Nov 30, 2009 18:49 |  #27

LOL.. sorry to interrupt, but am I the only photographer that doesn't do the "math" of it all?


www.joelenemillsphotog​raphy.ca (external link)
This is a beautiful shot ..bw!
Miniflash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 30, 2009 18:53 |  #28

Joelene wrote in post #9110699 (external link)
LOL.. sorry to interrupt, but am I the only photographer that doesn't do the "math" of it all?

What math?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joelene
Senior Member
930 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Nov 30, 2009 18:56 |  #29

RT McAllister wrote in post #9110226 (external link)
Yes. Throw that useless piece o' crap door stop away before you gets a hernia. :cry:

Well, If I did weddings in 40 acre parks while sitting in a barcalounger drinking Iced-T...

Seriously... STOP!!! Delete this stupid-assed thread now! The 70-200 sucks and I don't need one. I'd rather be standing on the altar... in plain view... right between the couple... with my 10mm doing justice to the groom's ear hair.


I agree, in a softer kinda girly way. That lens is big, bulky and heavy, I don't see a use for it at all what so ever, I use my tiny little 70-300 5.6 and I get more zoom. I use it because it is small, light and I have a anything that doens't fit in my camera bag, doens't go with me to a wedding rule, and it fits nicely :)


www.joelenemillsphotog​raphy.ca (external link)
This is a beautiful shot ..bw!
Miniflash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joelene
Senior Member
930 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Nov 30, 2009 19:01 |  #30

tim wrote in post #9110721 (external link)
What math?

the .... 1.6x 70-200 crop factor in a 20x20 room with a 10 foot ceiling will give you an image that is .... (said in my best big old man goofy face and voice) Math...

if the lens works ;) use it. If not change it. learn what works from experience and practice. Understand what lens will give you what advantage. Best two lenses in a wedding? A good portrait lens and a "fun" toy-ish lens... everyone has a different opinion on what is a good portrait lens and what is a good toy lens. Each photographer needs to figure that out for them self to be able to create images that they want to create.


www.joelenemillsphotog​raphy.ca (external link)
This is a beautiful shot ..bw!
Miniflash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,419 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Wedding lens?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1003 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.