I'm old school (and old), but the subject of the photo should be recognized when taking the picture. Then you can use composition or lighting to emphasize the subject.
If you find a hidden surprise when reviewing your photos, PP techniques (which is my weak point) are often the only way to add emphasis.
edit: I would also like to add that for a lot of us who learned on film, photography is less of a computer game and more of a sport, like hunting, only done with a camera. It might even be a good exercise to shoot for a while without much PP just to see what you can squeeze out of the camera. I'm not putting down PP. Today's photos are amazing, but I see a lot of beautiful technique "wasted" on a poor photo.
1D4, 6D, 7D2, Sony a6000 with Sony16-70, Rokinon 12mmf2, Canon lenses: 17-40L, 17-55 f2.8, 10-22, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 70-200mm IS 2.8, 300mm 2.8 IS, 580EXII (3), 430EX, Alien Bees.