Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 24 Nov 2009 (Tuesday) 13:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon body opinion wanted

 
-g-
Horribly disfigured but learning to cope
12,520 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Dec 2007
     
Nov 24, 2009 13:21 |  #1

What would you say is the best two body wedding combo for shooting ceremonies, formals and receptions? There is a need for low light performance even though fast glass and speedlights are already in hand.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Nov 24, 2009 13:24 |  #2

Can't do this unless you specify Full frame or cropped sensor. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacuff
Goldmember
Avatar
2,581 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Searcy, AR
     
Nov 24, 2009 13:26 |  #3

RT McAllister wrote in post #9074307 (external link)
Can't do this unless you specify Full frame or cropped sensor. ;)

Yes you can. 5D Mark II and the 1D Mark III make a great combo for shooting weddings. Of course it is also dependent on your glass and lighting. :cool:


Gear, Feedback (eBay (external link)), Web (external link), Blog (external link), FB (external link), Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Nov 24, 2009 13:27 as a reply to  @ RT McAllister's post |  #4

2x 5D2 for economy and light weight, great high iso in low light.

This is my favorite wedding photographer doing a canon class. In one episode he talks about his gear. I found it very enlightening.

http://cpn.canon-europe.com …lass/shooting_w​eddings.do (external link)


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Nov 24, 2009 13:53 |  #5

jacuff wrote in post #9074315 (external link)
Yes you can. 5D Mark II and the 1D Mark III make a great combo for shooting weddings.

Oh sure... let's throw that "mutant" 1D into the fray.

I was never keen on mixing sensors. The math hurts my head when buying glass :D

Edit: I actually read the OP's question wrong. Thought it was another one of those, "What 2 lenses would you carry if had to shoot the whole day in your underwear" posts.

Carry on folks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacuff
Goldmember
Avatar
2,581 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Searcy, AR
     
Nov 24, 2009 14:13 |  #6

RT McAllister wrote in post #9074450 (external link)
I was never keen on mixing sensors.

I used to shoot 2 full frame cameras, but switched to a 5D and 1D because of the way the 1D handles.

A close second suggestion would be the 5D Mark II and 7D combo. It's not a combo I've tested though. In fact, my only experience with a 7D was 5 minutes during the third quarter of a football game. I had already made my deadline so I let a friend use my 1DIII while I tried out his 7D. The 7D is a really decent camera, but I'd still pick a 1DIII over it. I could see how paired with a 5DII it would be part of a good wedding combo.


Gear, Feedback (eBay (external link)), Web (external link), Blog (external link), FB (external link), Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-g-
THREAD ­ STARTER
Horribly disfigured but learning to cope
12,520 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Dec 2007
     
Nov 24, 2009 14:21 |  #7

I've had a 1DIII and now have a 5D along with a 40D. The 40D doesn't seem to handle the higher ISO's well so I figured it'll go.

I've heard the 1DIII and 5D is a good pairing but the low light focusing of the 5D has been an issue and I understand the 5DII isn't really much better. I didn't want to jade opinions so I could get objective replies.

So, what bodies would YOU get? Money's not a big objection but I want to stay Canon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bnlearle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Nov 24, 2009 14:39 |  #8

I love having two 5DII's. Ideal, imo :)

Bobby


twitter (external link) // facebook (external link)
Website (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photographer blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 24, 2009 14:51 |  #9

I used 7D and 40D. More popular would be 5DII and 7D - 5D2 for most shots, and 7D when you need fast accurate AF. I was impressed with the pre-release 1D4 I used recently, and it had much the same button layout as the 7D which made it really easy to control. The 1D2 I picked up once was a bit confusing.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsw910
Goldmember
Avatar
2,650 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Nyc
     
Nov 24, 2009 15:22 |  #10

i used to shoot with 2 x 5d2 .. sold one of the 5d2 and now i shoot with 1 x 5d2 and 1 x 1d3 .. perfect combo .. and it turns your lens collection to double

with the 5d2 AF .. it is a bit whatever .. but when its paired with the 580 assist, it works .. but i dont think it really bothered me much knowing what i am buying into ..


Scuba Tom
http://tomwangphotogra​phy.com (external link)NYC Wedding Photographer (external link)http://www.tomwangphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RT ­ McAllister
Senior Member
973 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Nov 24, 2009 16:00 |  #11

tim wrote in post #9074807 (external link)
I used 7D and 40D.

But those are both 1.6x sensors. I wonder if the OP is asking about different crops(?) There are fans of this type of arrangement because you can basically turn one EF lens into 2 by taking it from say a 5D to a 7D. Personally though, I'd rather have a truck load of 1D 4's. :D

But I see more mixed crops out there due to somebody just upgrading to a FF and keeping the crop for a backup. Nothing wrong with that. Of course if you only buy EF-S glass and go FF you're kinda' screwed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-g-
THREAD ­ STARTER
Horribly disfigured but learning to cope
12,520 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Dec 2007
     
Nov 24, 2009 16:07 |  #12

RT McAllister wrote in post #9075226 (external link)
But those are both 1.6x sensors. I wonder if the OP is asking about different crops(?)

I'm looking for opinions either way. I have a 1.6 crop and full frame. I had a 1.3 and didn't mind it either. I'm really on the fence here and that's why I'm asking. I like full frame but the only choices are IDSIII or 5DII. Nobody's suggested the 1DSIII yet but the 5DII is sure popular even though it wasn't well received when it was launched.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Nov 24, 2009 16:11 as a reply to  @ -g-'s post |  #13

you know I shoot nikon...but the reason I didn't buy D3's when I switched over was that when working all day with two cameras, lenses gear etc...I personally prefer the smaller cameras, less weight. That's why I didn't suggest the ds3. It's a lovely camera.


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booboo
Senior Member
Avatar
333 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Race Town, VA
     
Nov 24, 2009 16:28 |  #14

both 40D's on the cropper for me now since I love the 17-55 2.8 IS and I am poor!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 24, 2009 16:30 |  #15

RT McAllister wrote in post #9075226 (external link)
But those are both 1.6x sensors. I wonder if the OP is asking about different crops(?) There are fans of this type of arrangement because you can basically turn one EF lens into 2 by taking it from say a 5D to a 7D. Personally though, I'd rather have a truck load of 1D 4's. :D

But I see more mixed crops out there due to somebody just upgrading to a FF and keeping the crop for a backup. Nothing wrong with that. Of course if you only buy EF-S glass and go FF you're kinda' screwed.

That's why I said 5DII/7D would be a more popular combo, I was just saying what I use. The downside of the 5DII/7D combo is you need EF lenses for the 5DII, which can be more expensive than crop lenses. You also lose the 17-55 F2.8 IS, which until the 24-70 F2.8 IS comes out is the best standard zoom for wedding photographers IMHO. The reason I don't have a 5DII isn't because of the camera cost, it's because there's no 24-70 F2.8 IS and i'd have to buy a 35L - so probably US$8K. The 7D cost US$2K or so. Photography's a business, the more you spend the less profit you make.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,353 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Canon body opinion wanted
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
572 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.