Demi Moore is missing a hip... or her entire torso?

The latest in celebrity photoshop controversies took an odd spin today. First there was this --

http://consumerist.com …looking-for-its-home.html

where it certainly looks like part of her hip was poorly 'shopped out. The photographer claimed on Twitter that this certainly was not his original image. Now today this:

http://consumerist.com …res-torso-is-missing.html

Someone now says her entire torso was copied from another image. I looked closely at the two and I don't think this is the case. The fabric on the garments doesn't match up at all between them. I do think she is missing part of her hip, though.

http://consumerist.com …Demi-Moore-Anja-Rubik.jpg

That's shocking.

Not the Photoshopping, but the physical state of that model.

I guess Demi hasn't held the shape she had when she made Striptease.

She came out on stage (Letterman I think), whipped off the robe she was wearing over something skimpy and slinky and I just fell out of my chair! Gawd she looked so ripped that night.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #9075725
I guess Demi hasn't held the shape she had when she made Striptease.

She came out on stage (Letterman I think), whipped off the robe she was wearing over something skimpy and slinky and I just fell out of my chair! Gawd she looked so ripped that night.

Unfortunately, she probably DOES have a killer body... I bet she is in fantastic shape, especially for being in her late 40s. The ****ty thing is that a magazine still thought they had to do something to her to 'improve it'... and this is someone who probably works out hours per day, has trainers, dieticians, and is in the business of staying beautiful.

She defended her self on Twitter saying back to the photographer that it was the original image and was not photoshopped... so she certainly believes she looks that good and doesn't require the help.

Mike-DT6 wrote in post #9075712
That's shocking.

Not the Photoshopping, but the physical state of that model.

Time for an intervention and a sandwich, eh??

TheHoff wrote in post #9075752
Time for an intervention and a sandwich, eh??

Yes, definitely. It would take me about three weeks and a lot of effort, but I think I could save her.

Mike-DT6 wrote in post #9075794
Yes, definitely. It would take me about three weeks and a lot of effort, but I think I could save her.

The selfless devotion to humanity of loyal POTNers brings a tear to the eye!

This has me thinking.. Is this a breach of copyright??

yogestee wrote in post #9076431
This has me thinking.. Is this a breach of copyright??

You mean of the original fashion shot image that allegedly was copied for use on the magazine cover? Interesting point.

You guys have totally missed what happened here.
Her husband took the photo with his Nikon:p

stsva wrote in post #9076463
You mean of the original fashion shot image that allegedly was copied for use on the magazine cover? Interesting point.

Exactly!!

yogestee wrote in post #9076431
This has me thinking.. Is this a breach of copyright??

No. Within this thread, there are only links and the smallest snippet of a quote. The linked articles are clearly editorial comment, fully fair use.

oops sorry PhotosGuy, I shouldn't have posted the image in the thread.

RDKirk wrote in post #9077491
No. Within this thread, there are only links and the smallest snippet of a quote. The linked articles are clearly editorial comment, fully fair use.

Not in this thread but does the very bad cut and paste breach copyright.. How does the photographer feel about this??

Hey Jurgen if you look closely at the photos I think you'd agree it isn't the model's torso. Just a coincidence that they are wearing the same outfit with somewhat of the same pose. Looking at the draping of the pieces of fabric and the lighting and lines and creases, it would take more work to photoshop the model's body onto Demi (and change all of the fabric that has moved) rather than just liquifying Demi into the right shape.