Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 28 Nov 2009 (Saturday) 05:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Carrying your equipment

 
slimenta
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Nov 28, 2009 05:41 |  #1

I have to shoot a football game today and will bring 400 mm, 300 mm and 200 mm lenses as well as shorter lenses. I need my macbook for halftime processing. Currently own the tamrac expedition 7 but have looked at the expedition 9. I also looked at the lowepro trekker II. Both will accomodate the 400 mm lens and the 200 and 300 go in my think tank belt. Any experience, thoughts or recommendations.


www.stevenlimentanipho​tography.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=8865 (external link)
1DX x 2, 1D Mark IV X 4, 5D Mark III x 3, 200-400, 4.0, 400 2.8 (II), 300 2.8, 200 2.0, 70-200 2.8 (II),135 2.0, 85, 1.2, 50 1.2, 24 1.4, 17-55 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 16-35 2.8, 28-300 3.5-5.6, 100-400 4.5-5.6, 16-35, 2.8, 8-15, 4.0 fisheye, 1.4 X and 2X TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MJPhotos24
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,619 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Attica, NY / Parrish, FL
     
Nov 28, 2009 08:26 |  #2

My thought is do you really need that many lenses for football? Usually it's a three lens system - 400 (or 300), 70-200, and a wide for most - the ol' less is more thought process as you don't want to be fumbling around too much. Other sports I'd like to have the 300/400 with me at all times but sometimes just stick with the 400. Last time I brought the 300/400 for football the 300 didn't see much action except to test the tracking on the MKIII and then put right away. Always good to have backups though just in case. Anyways, I use a tamrac roller, something like this...

http://www.whcamera.co​m …srollingstongbo​x-lp5.aspx (external link)

Fits enough, and going to re-design to make it fit more.


Freelance Photographer & Co-founder of Four Seam Images
Mike Janes Photography (external link) - Four Seam Images LLC (external link)
FSI is a baseball oriented photo agency and official licensee of MiLB/MLB.
@FourSeamImages (instagram/twitter)
@MikeJanesPhotography (instagram)
@MikeJanesPhotog (twitter)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slimenta
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Nov 28, 2009 20:38 |  #3

MJPhotos24 wrote in post #9095567 (external link)
My thought is do you really need that many lenses for football? Usually it's a three lens system - 400 (or 300), 70-200, and a wide for most - the ol' less is more thought process as you don't want to be fumbling around too much. Other sports I'd like to have the 300/400 with me at all times but sometimes just stick with the 400. Last time I brought the 300/400 for football the 300 didn't see much action except to test the tracking on the MKIII and then put right away. Always good to have backups though just in case. Anyways, I use a tamrac roller, something like this...

http://www.whcamera.co​m …srollingstongbo​x-lp5.aspx (external link)

Fits enough, and going to re-design to make it fit more.

Of course you are correct. Today I shot SCSU v App State and used 400, 200 and 17-55. I use the 200 because it is simply such good glass. The 300 stayed in the bag. My upcoming trip is to shoot the US Development Academy soccer showcase in Phoenix, I would not usually bring a 400 mm lens for that but wanted to because it is a new lens and I want to play with it and experiment with soccer. Because of the issue of players being in the way for clear long shots, I do not believe the 400 mm lens is as good for soccer as it is for football where it is obviously great. I usually also bring my 135 2L and my 50 1.2 as well as a fisheye. Do I use them all, no. But I expect to shoot at least eight games over the course of four days in different lights including low light.


www.stevenlimentanipho​tography.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=8865 (external link)
1DX x 2, 1D Mark IV X 4, 5D Mark III x 3, 200-400, 4.0, 400 2.8 (II), 300 2.8, 200 2.0, 70-200 2.8 (II),135 2.0, 85, 1.2, 50 1.2, 24 1.4, 17-55 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 16-35 2.8, 28-300 3.5-5.6, 100-400 4.5-5.6, 16-35, 2.8, 8-15, 4.0 fisheye, 1.4 X and 2X TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vreeke
Senior Member
257 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Dec 18, 2009 12:25 |  #4

invite a caddy is an option, by the way for football you need only 400 mm and 15 mm


1D3 - 24-70mm 2,8 - 85mm 1.2 - 300mm 2,8 IS wow

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Dec 22, 2009 06:48 as a reply to  @ slimenta's post |  #5

Seriously... as Mike said, leave half of stuff at home, unless you want to bring it to show off ;) 400/2.8 is great lens for football (sorry soccer for you guys). Personally I actually prefer 500/4 if only there's enough light. So my "standard" thing for soccer is 300/2.8 or 500/4 on one 1d, 70-200/2.8 on other, and if I put remotes, 16-35/2.8 on third 1d behind goal. That's all I need for soccer (of course 16-35 and remotes are optional :), so basically one of longer lenses and 70-200 is normal soccer combo.


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,677 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Carrying your equipment
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
774 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.