locky Goldmember  2,663 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Montague, Michigan More info | Nov 29, 2009 09:12 | #1  Permanent banWell we did it. Back to back State Champions. Here's just 2 quick pics from over 1000 I took. Will post more later tonight.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. I just got my first pair of glasses that I didn't think I needed. I apologize to anybody in the past year that I said their pictures were out of focus lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicmo Senior Member  413 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Hollister, Ca More info | Nov 29, 2009 09:29 | #2 Congratulations! --Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
locky THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,663 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Montague, Michigan More info | Nov 29, 2009 12:21 | #3 Permanent banThanks nicmo. I was a little dissapointed in the 70-200 2.8IS though. Don't get me wrong it is a great lens but I had to shoot at ISO 1600, 400 Shutter speed at f/2.8. A guy I was talking to was using the Sigma 70-200 2.8 and he was shooting ISO 2000, 800-1000 Shutter speed at f/2.8. I understand the difference in the ISO but is that going to give you that much more speed? I just got my first pair of glasses that I didn't think I needed. I apologize to anybody in the past year that I said their pictures were out of focus lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ryan_in_the_U.P. Member 77 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Dollar Bay, MIchigan More info | Congratulations to the Montague Wildcats, watched part of the game on FSN, they looked really good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard"  More info | Nov 29, 2009 14:15 | #5 locky wrote in post #9102047  Thanks nicmo. I was a little dissapointed in the 70-200 2.8IS though. Don't get me wrong it is a great lens but I had to shoot at ISO 1600, 400 Shutter speed at f/2.8. A guy I was talking to was using the Sigma 70-200 2.8 and he was shooting ISO 2000, 800-1000 Shutter speed at f/2.8. I understand the difference in the ISO but is that going to give you that much more speed? f/2.8 is f/2.8 all over the world and ISO 2000 is 1/3 stop higher than 1600. That takes your 1/400 and should allow 1/500. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
locky THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,663 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Montague, Michigan More info | Nov 29, 2009 15:12 | #6 Permanent banMaybe the guy was underexposing for some reason or didn't know it. Another photographer who was using the same lens as me had the same settings. As for the game it was exciting. Our star quarterback broke his middle finger during practice and played the whole game in pain with every throw. You could tell he was not in his zone. He only had 2 fumbles the whole season and one just happen to be during the Championship game. Even though we weren't at our best we came through when we needed too. I just got my first pair of glasses that I didn't think I needed. I apologize to anybody in the past year that I said their pictures were out of focus lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2862 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
