Sydor25 Goldmember  2,356 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2005 Location: North Texas More info | Nov 29, 2009 20:33 | #1 1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevincc Member 164 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: MA More info | Nov 29, 2009 21:00 | #2 waaaay over processed http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinblahh/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
reddyroc007 Senior Member  809 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Iqaluit, NU More info | Nov 29, 2009 21:56 | #3 looks like hdr. i'd prolly like it even more without the hdr treatment. chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jubu Senior Member 752 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: NYC, USA More info | Nov 29, 2009 21:57 | #4 I actually kinda like the *intense* post-processing...nice pic...miss Boston a lot...lived there for several years... Canon EOS 5D Mark II | My Flickr Favorites
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Morlow Goldmember  2,824 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Yellowstone National Park More info | Nov 30, 2009 00:16 | #5 Looks sort of like a painting on my screen. Pretty cool though. Chris Knapp
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop  29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Nov 30, 2009 07:49 | #6 I like it, don't think it's overdone. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cyclop Cream of the Crop 6,899 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Nov 30, 2009 08:05 | #7 Beautiful shot, I really like it. Canon 50D w/grip, Canon 7D, Mark II w/grip, Tokina UWA 11-16 2.8, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS, Canon 300 4 L IS, Canon 400 5.6 L, Canon 100 "macro" 2.8, Canon 60 "macro" 2.8, Canon Extender 1.4xII, Gitzo 3531S tripod w/Markins M20 ballhead, Gitzo GT2531EX tripod, Bogen-Manfrotto 681B monopod w/3232 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2009 11:12 | #8 i like it... My Gear My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LostShootingStar Goldmember 1,005 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Nov 30, 2009 11:12 | #9 Wow, love it! The sky looks great
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember  4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Nov 30, 2009 11:53 | #11 I think you pushed the shadows under the bridge way too far, but other than that it's nice. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
symbolphoto Cream of the Crop  6,628 posts Likes: 18 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Boston, MA More info | Nov 30, 2009 12:40 | #12 It's ok. I think a blending of two photos with the exposure slider set to over/under would be a better photo. The HDR crap isn't doing it for me in this photo. If you have shot in RAW, try using the underexposed for the sky and the overexposed for the tracks and bridge and such. You can equalize through layers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2009 17:11 | #13 Thanks everyone for the comments. I was going for the high contrast, heavy process look. This was just one shot worked in Photoshop, much more processing than I usually do,  1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KitCloudkicker Member  218 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Branford, CT More info | Nov 30, 2009 17:19 | #14 looks good, ive taken some shots from there but not quite from that angle Canon 6D, 24-105 f/4, 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1326 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
